It’s not so much that’s it weak, it just requires an extra step to generate and offers more types of lists as XML such as Pull, Scene Pull, Change list, etc. which can cause some confusion.
The bigger issue is that XML is not a one type file description. It allows for easier description of metadata by allowing the tage to live with the description. But what FCP calls Reel, Avid calls Tape so there needs to be an XML to XML translator file called an XSLT to get moving in that direction.
Also, the XML from Avid is as complete as FilmScribe offers, so deep effects and others are not as richly described as one may want to have.
AAF is the easier way to go right now for this type of workflow. XML from Avid is being used on large feature type prodcutions to parse the type of metadata used in those workflows.
Michael
Michael Phillips