Forum Replies Created

Page 4 of 39
  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 17, 2012 at 9:40 pm in reply to: XML to After Effects

    Premiere supports Resolve 8.2 beta 4 XMLs pretty nicely, and then roundtrips to After Effects even more nicely. Would that be an option?

  • Also remember, during playback, your computer is reading video, processing the image, and that’s it.

    During render, it also has to compress, and write frames to disk, so, depending on drives and CPU bottlenecking, framerate WILL drop compared to playback.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 14, 2012 at 7:59 pm in reply to: Shift timeline start timecode in a session

    You can set start time code while importing the XML, but not after as far as I know.

    Also, as to why it shifted – can’t say for sure, but I know Resolve will ignore any empty space before your first clip. So if your first media clip was at :41:16 that could be a reason for that.

  • Thank you so much Rohit. This has definitely been a huge problem for me lately.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 11, 2012 at 8:47 pm in reply to: Force conform

    Theoretically, this is what Unmix is for. From the manual:

    “Unmix is essentially the same as the Clip mode, however no effects such as dissolves
    or speed changes will be displayed.”

    But I tried it, and in Unmix the clip still plays back at the speed in the conform timeline.

    I would personally love for Resolve to get even simple frame blending, so I can just bake in speed ramps on render and not rely on FCP to do it.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 11, 2012 at 4:11 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve 8.2 beta 4

    No more windows pro res? At least that’s what I got.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 10, 2012 at 7:08 pm in reply to: Avid Dnx Quicktime wrapped .mov in Resolve

    Is it licensing cost that makes dnxhd quicktimes unavailable?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 10, 2012 at 5:17 pm in reply to: 470 performance

    Thanks for this link! This article implies that actually properly editing the kext should yield better performance than deleting it. I’ll try it out

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 10, 2012 at 5:10 pm in reply to: 470 performance

    Running Windows 7, with Resolve 8.2 beta 3.

    I don’t have a benchmark to back that up though. I’ll try the blur node and nr node comparison test as soon as I have a chance.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 10, 2012 at 4:13 pm in reply to: 470 performance

    Yep, same thing happened to me.

    I gotta say, my 470 on the mac is slower still than the same 470 running in Windows on the same mac.

Page 4 of 39

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy