Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 39
  • Vladimir Kucherov

    September 5, 2013 at 12:31 pm in reply to: Candle test V10?!

    Great idea! However, what’s the best way to handle isolating the things we are testing. Your 2.5k cinema DNG footage, for example, might bottleneck GPU/CPU performance. However, doing tests on lightweight SD clips wouldn’t correctly show performance when performing temporal effects on 4k footage.

    What about 1080, and 4k ProRes 4444 clips?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    June 10, 2013 at 8:54 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro

    What are the bandwidth differences we are talking about?

    PCIe 2 x16 which is what is in all the current mac pros is currently 8gb/s from the reading I could find. TB2 according to the presentation supports 20gb/s. What am I missing in terms of it not being fast enough for GPU work?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    June 10, 2013 at 6:16 pm in reply to: New Mac Pro

    I’m fairly impressed. If it works. They’re basically taking what everyone is doing right now anyway – expanding a tower with external boxes, and designing around it.

    This allows them to sell a GPU accessory kit with extra power and room for the craziest stuff that comes out. Should make the system more upgradable.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    April 16, 2013 at 6:35 pm in reply to: Manually Entering Timecode

    Nope – I’ve been hoping for this for a while, but this is only available if you have the 30k DaVinci panels.

    Although, I’m assuming that will change in Resolve 10. You can’t really call it an editorial software and not be able to type in timecode.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    April 15, 2013 at 4:19 am in reply to: Replacement video card for GUI

    By only card, you mean just have the 680 as GUI + Cuda?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    April 8, 2013 at 9:15 pm in reply to: DaVinci Resolve 10

    Question – now that you’re giving us even more ways to kill real-time playback (OFX and optical flow), will there be changes to the way the render cache works?

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    April 8, 2013 at 4:57 pm in reply to: DaVinci Resolve 10

    wow. that’s pretty much all of my wishlist and more. thanks guys!

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 26, 2013 at 3:16 pm in reply to: archiving projects

    You can render the project out as a flat pass, with handles, and re-import the DaVinci Generated XML back into Resolve. Now your source media are the “V1-001” files from Resolve without color on them, and you can use ColorTrace to get your grade back on those, and archive. That’s one thing I can think of.

    Also, Resolve now seems to be able to copy files on the file-system within the application (at least on Mac), so if you only imported the clips in your cut, you can copy those to an archive drive.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    February 18, 2013 at 10:12 pm in reply to: “Idea” for resolve as a full compositor.

    This is what I would like the most – I don’t want Resolve to be bloated into a VFX package – but I would like a dead simple out and back in, so I can send a shot to Nuke/After Effects, do what I need to it, like add a flare, denoise, grain, do motion blended time remapping, etc, and have it appear back in my Resolve timeline ready to be graded further or exported with the rest of the program.

  • Vladimir Kucherov

    January 24, 2013 at 4:14 pm in reply to: Remote grading disaster with Red camera.

    This sounds like a big bug that should be fixed. There are all sorts of weird inconsistencies with R3D metadata adjustments. My least favorite in a non remote grading sense:

    Apply correction from another shot that modifies the R3D meta, hit undo, the correction is removed, but the metadata is changed and cannot be undone. Have to manually dial it back.

Page 1 of 39

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy