Forum Replies Created

Page 213 of 242
  • Andy Mees

    June 21, 2006 at 3:23 am in reply to: HD XDCam editing

    [mschirad] What I did hear is that the Sony beta software won’t send your finished sequence back to the deck/XDCam disk.

    AFAIK Not true … the beta Sony plugin included an Export option which worked well

    [mschirad] You have to use 25 megabit for everything

    until Apple release the SP and HQ codecs (and hopefully low-res proxy codec too) then this is unfortunately the case

    cheers
    Andy

  • Andy Mees

    June 15, 2006 at 2:35 pm in reply to: Duh…lower field or upper field first

    but he/she did specifically post that it was NTSC . ah well, we all make mistakes (just some more often than others!)

  • Andy Mees

    June 15, 2006 at 2:06 pm in reply to: Duh…lower field or upper field first

    good catch! the danger of living in PAL land and giving out advice … i shall hush my mouth 🙁

  • Andy Mees

    June 15, 2006 at 1:17 pm in reply to: Duh…lower field or upper field first

    Uncompressed should be Upper field first

  • sounds like a classic case of permissions issues. on the external media drives use “Get Info” to ensure that the “Ignore ownership on this volume” checkbox has been checked. also make sure that project files are quicktime exports are saved into a “Shared” location

  • Andy Mees

    June 15, 2006 at 12:22 pm in reply to: difference between Export options

    “Quicktime Movie”>current setting> check make movie self contained movie … creates a new media file representing your edit without any recompression
    “Quicktime Conversion”>defualt setting … creates a new media file representing your edit but with recompression to the default codec

    unless you need to recompress to a different codec, then Export > Quicktime Movie… with current settings will give you the best quality

  • [SammyClam] I’ve started pulling down the whites and saturation where necessary but find it extremely time consuming.

    it is time consuming Sammy, but this is part of the job .. its this kind of attention to detail and professionalism that we get paid for

    [SammyClam] I’d be quite content to leave it as is — and legalize later if I indeed make a sale –and start burning DVDs. But will others run into problems on their TVs or settop players such as color bleeding or signal distortion?

    yes indeed, broadcast or otherwise, if this is going to be viewed on a standard consumer TV then you need to legalize the levels or you will run into trouble

    quoting now from Andrew Baliss’s article on Ken Stones FCP website

    “It is important to get to know the color correction tools and start to develop an eye for color. But, just as important, we will also need to consider other factors (and I’m not talking about whether the client has sugar for their coffee). Specifically, we will at all times need to be aware that our final color corrected images are “broadcast legal”. Whatever we do, our final concern is that these beautiful new images won’t be rejected by the broadcaster. Even if the program is not going to be broadcast, but distributed on DVD or another medium, we still have to keep these goals in mind for the images to be accurately represented on consumer level televisions. Sometimes our color correction has less to do with creating a look, and more to do with making it legal.”

    you can read the full article here:
    https://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/cc_legal_fcp3.html

    you can also find more than you wanted to know here:
    https://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/video_levels_nattress.html

    hope it helps
    Andy

  • Andy Mees

    June 14, 2006 at 4:12 pm in reply to: Apple 30″ LCD

    not long enough to reach next door. you’ll need a dvi extension cable.

  • Andy Mees

    June 14, 2006 at 3:04 pm in reply to: User bits

    >Are you sure?

    Hi Mark

    Well, I’ve certainly not ever done this, so I’m not talking from experience here. We all know that UB’s can be inserted on a frame by frame basis (you can do this from the front panel of any Sony beta deck given the time and inclination!), so my assumption is a) that given the right equipment the data should be able to be recorded, and b) the original poster has already done it

    >Have you every seen a secondary (aux) running code displayed in the the userbits field? I haven’t.

    Nope, Me neither … but again, the poster has said that he already has this.

    >And… how do you get this “aux” code onto the tape?

    the sixty million dollar question

    Sorry its not the definitive answer!
    Cheers
    Andy

  • Andy Mees

    June 14, 2006 at 12:58 pm in reply to: Deck control

    the list would be huge!

    FCP should control any deck using the Firewire, if you have the requisite hardware then it has no problem using the RS422 protocol either.

Page 213 of 242

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy