Rick Diamond
Forum Replies Created
-
Capture the footage as 8-bit uncompressed. If you capture as DV and then render the DV footage on an uncompressed timeline it looks like crap.
Rick
-
Postman, you’re right on the money. Thank you! Now, another question: The raid was just recently changed from RAID0 to RAID5 and I’m noticing that when playing back, the playback chokes and reports dropped frames. The RAID size since changing to RAID5 is 2.18TB and I’ve got 1.88TB free. Any thoughts?
Rick
-
I’d love a refreshing thumbnail.
-
Don’t believe that’s true. Uncompressed is lower field first.
Rick
-
Thanks for the response, but I forgot to mention I need Mac compatible.
Rick
-
The reason for my post is that Nick is capturing multiple sources none of which are DVCPro50. Instead of using uncompressed as his editing codec of choice, he is using the DVCPro50 codec. That begged the question, why DVCPro50 instead of uncompressed?
My sources are all flavors of analog and DVCam.
Rick
-
Are you editing in the DVCPro50 codec because it’s cleaner than uncompressed? Walter, have you compared the two? I edit uncompressed but would change if there are good reasons to.
Rick
-
Try dragging and dropping the file directly into the Squeeze window.
Rick
-
If I’m reading between the lines correctly, it seems as if you’re looking for a 24P(film)look. If this is what you’re expecting, the 900, which produces an interlaced video look, will dissapoint.
Rick
-
There is no debate. Component without doubt produces a higher quality image than S-video.
Rick