I ran CS/Matrox set ups for years as having a native format to work with was always top priority as was SDI and/or component in and out. Once CS4 came out with 64-bit and I was able to load my HP workstation (8200?) up with 32gig of RAM I couldn’t understand how anybody could still WANT to edit in 32-bit regardless of platform or editing software. Then came CS5 and the CUDA cards. Got the upgrade, got the card and kicked Matrox to the curb. Never looked back. So I’ve been using CS since v1 through XP to Vista-64 to Win7-64 and have used it for everything imaginable. Couldn’t have been happier.
I run CS5.5/6 and on a MBP now with no TBolt peripherals but a 27″ Cinema and it works better than my old HP workstation. 8 gig of ram and nothing else added. FCPX on the same machine is a freaking nightmare. Slow, clunky, lost projects, projects changed (from 1080/29.97 to 720/25? Really? and no way to change it back!) and damaged after beachball induced restarts.
I like FCPX. I really do. There’s a lot there to like. I just don’t like the way it runs. I CANNOT watch footage render knowing I’d be zipping through it were I in PPro. Maybe that’s just me.
So everybody has their experience and that’s mine. If anything starts mucking up on your machine the first thing I’d start with is to go totally native and pull any I/O out of the mix and see what happens. Getting out from under Matrox’s thumb was liberating. It’s my opinion that that’s how all this editing software is developed despite any 3rd party’s best intentions.