There is something to be said about formats that are also their own archiving format such as film, tape based HD, SD, etc. The same goes for the audio world – recording to a DVD-RAM or to a FireWire. In some cases, you just hand over the assets and you leave. In others it will require you to copy to another drive format for transport and archive. Think of the Panasonic P2 camera as training ground for all of this…
In the case of a higher resolution file based camera, regardless of camera manufacturer, archive and transport will present challenges (AKA opportunities) in the workflow. For a 4K workflow, anticipate lots of storage. First there are the drives that are on set capturing. These drives then get moved – most likely there will be an archive at the same resolution. Also, the archive may involve a transcode to a DPX type format depending on whether RED releases its native EAW format, or not. So same size drive, but speed of drive is not an issue since it is for archive. Could be tape or optical as well. Then there is the issue of what format will be used for editorial. No one will be editing 4K native due to size and bandwidth. The 4K files will be used for conform. So another transcode will be done to either SD or HD, most likely a low bandwidth HD such as DNxHD 115 or DNxHD 36. So that will need additional storage albeit not as much. DNxHD 36 will need about 305GB for 18.5 hours of material.
There is time involved with transcode so that will need to be scheduled, most likely something on the set within the video village. The capture drives may have the ability to play out over a dual link to an HDCAM-SR in RGB 4:4:4 mode for a submaster into post. This will be near 2K 1920 x 1080 in RGB space. This is what is being done now with other file based cameras.
Welcome to the world of files… and management… and backup, backup, and backup. Just an FYI, FireWire drives are not the most long term reliable format for archive – great for transport though.
Michael
anything 24fps