If everyone adhered to the “A” frame falling on 30fps NDF timecodes ending on 0 and 5’s, then we can get close to a matchback in every one’s software being the same. There can be different algorithms used to derive a matchback from one frame rate to another such as allowing a but to be +/-1 frame at the head and tail, head only, tail only, different rules for dissolves, etc. In the case where you say take a 30 frame EDL – unless the timeline was being edited a 30, thee is a matchback being done from 24 to 30, then you take the 30 back to 24. You may introduce a 1-2 error on any on frame. Editing at 24 and making a 24 frame EDL is the most frame accurate.
As far as I know, Cinema Tools doesn’t really track the A, B, C, D, and X of the cadence relationship which can also affect the frame accuracy. But as I said, IF and a big IF – everyone observes the “A” frames on 0 and 5 you should be as close as you can get with a 24 to 24 EDL for conform.
And I realize that PAL does not have a lot of these problems, but in the end, I would still prefer to work in 23.976 in NTSC world becuase the difference is only .1% rather than the 4.1% difference in 24/25 and the audio workflow is easier. Just my humble opinion. Of course that is not an issue for 25/25 workflows.
Michael
Michael Phillips