I am with Tom on this one.
Best edits are those where you do not need transitions.
If you can do a complete edit without them, and the viewer still enjoys your film, then your job is done right.
However, music videos are often fast paced, and YouTube viewers have been “conditioned” to watch bad editing at a pace that eventually will either bore you or give you a headache. Sorry, that was a bit generic, but the message is the same.
Are we accepting the: “Hey, WHAT’s UP, FOLKS!!!” videos with loads of finger snapping at the camera and “machine-gun-jump-cut editing, whilst the editor frantically is trying to edit in a good take of the next sound-bite?😀
Talking about musicvideos specifically. Because they often have limited budgets with a restriction on location and kit. If you look closely, they often make use of in camera “transistions”.
One example is where you see the artist walking in wide shot, with something the foreground that they walk behind, then to come out in a close-up or new location on the other side of that object.
There are ways of making that very complicated (and expensive). Or you can just track the camera alongside the performer, whilst someone pushes a box, pillar or limosine in the other direction between the camera and the artist.😉
What we all know: There is no right or wrong when it comes to editing (or dissolving) a video. Only thing that matters is whether your audience will watch it, and if they watch it to the end.
Just an opinion.
Atb
Mads