Joey Burnham
Forum Replies Created
-
Does taking a still of a hi-res version of the text not work for you? As I said before, if it’s not spinning or anything you can just animate the still of your “3D” text.
Joey -
Can’t you just make your text really big and then take a still frame of it and animate that? If it’s not spinning at all this could work for you.
Joey -
Not yet. Still on 6. But QT has not fixed this either way.
Joey -
[Jeramy Hearn] “It would save so much time by not having to animate text…”
facepalm and large sigh…
-
Correct. I read the post too fast. But, at least better DVD’s make them more universally playable.
JoeyPost is filling up with doggies! 🙂
-
Verbatim
-
Sorry I didn’t mean to confuse the issue. I just thought it should be noted that by stating that the above stills are 4×3 1.33 is misinformation. As you said, they could be letterboxed 16×9 footage, or any flavor of SD 4×3.
Joey -
[Arnie Schlissel] “Your aspect ratio is either 4×3, aka 1.33 or 16×9, aka 1.78”
4×3 1.33 is full frame. You can still have 4×3 1.78, 4×3 2.35, 4×3 2.40, etc.
Likewise you can have 16×9 1.78, 16×9 2.35, etc.Not arguing but just don’t want people to think that all 4×3 is 1.33 and all 16×9 is 1.78
Joey
-
[Jason Brown] “If that is the case, then the preset for 720p in AE should be a frame rate of 59.94.”
Where do you see a preset for 720p? I’m looking through the presets now and none of them are listed as p or i. Are you in CS4?
Joey
-
[Jason Brown] “What I don’t get is why AE’s template for 720 is 29.97, NOT 59.94.”
Cause they are the same thing. 59.94 is 60 interlaced FIELDS per second and 29.97 is 30 interlaced FRAMES per second.
There are plenty of articles on why this is but when HD was first coming out there was a lot of confusion out there and some things just stuck.
[Jason Brown] ”
Everyone who I know that is shooting 720 @ 60fps uses it in a 29.97 comp so it plays back footage in slo-motion.”They are shooting progressive, no? Different ballgame.
Joey