Creative Communities of the World Forums

The peer to peer support community for media production professionals.

Activity Forums Cinematography HD resolutions… Correct forum?

  • HD resolutions… Correct forum?

    Posted by Jason Brown on December 8, 2009 at 8:50 pm

    Hey Guys,

    I have a generic resolution question and not sure if this is the best place for it.

    I’ve been editing in HDV 1440×1080 1.33 PAR @ 60i for a long time now…I don’t get too fancy with frame rates and 24p or anything like that.

    I’m trying to understand the 720 world…why is 720 listed in many places as: 1280 x 720 – 59.94? I’m not referring to the decimal value…just why isn’t it 29.97? Does this mean that the 720 is played back at halfspeed at this framerate? Or are there double the amount of frames per second?

    Can someone help me understand?

    -Jason

    Bob Pierce replied 16 years, 4 months ago 7 Members · 23 Replies
  • 23 Replies
  • Micah Mcdowell

    December 8, 2009 at 10:21 pm

    720 at 59.94 would mean likely mean 720p, which is 59.94 full progressive frames per second.

    The 1080i HDV you’ve been working in is 60i, meaning 59.94 interlaced fields per second, which corresponds to a “framerate” of 29.97. Does that answer your question?

  • John Sharaf

    December 8, 2009 at 10:29 pm

    Jason,

    Because progressive frame rates do not have “half” frames (otherwise known as “fields”) there are now 60 frames per second instead of 30 frames. This is why some observers think that 720/60p creates a “smoother” action than interlaced formats.

    When you specify 720/30p, each of the distinct 30 frames are repeated one time to create the 60 frames that are consumed each second. At this frame rate the “action” looks more “filmic” because it includes a 2:2 pull down cadance.

    Hope this helps,

    JS

  • Jason Brown

    December 9, 2009 at 1:41 am

    OK…I think I got it…I’ve worked with NTSC D1 interlaced Betacam SD video for a LONG time…so I fully understand interlacing.

    Question about 720p…so I can do 720p at 29.97…right? I know I’ve naively rendered things to the 720 resolution at 29.97 progressive. (played back on a media box…worked correctly)

    I think I was mosly confused by the fact that 1080 is listed at 60i sometimes…but I’ve never heard the listing 60p…wouldn’t that be the correct way to refer to 720p footage?

    1920×1080 60i would be 30 frames per second interlaced.
    1280x720p could be called 60p? Correct?

    Thanks for helping me understand this guys…

    -Jason

  • Bram Desmet

    December 9, 2009 at 3:35 am

    To avoid confusion it is generally a really good idea to list both the native resolution and native frame rate. You would not want to refer to 1280x720p60 as just 60p because there is also a 1920x1080p60 broadcast format, albeit at almost 3Gbps bandwidth. You also have the less common 480p60 (flavor of EDTV) formats so 60p could be misleading as it does not necessarily imply 1280x720p60.

    Bram Desmet
    FSI (Flanders Scientific, Inc.)
    http://www.FlandersScientific.com

  • Jason Brown

    December 9, 2009 at 3:52 am

    Does the 720 format come in other flavors or is the standard 60fps?

    I may be asking a loaded question, because I’m guessing that delivery is dependent upon “standard” … I’m not referring to broadcast…only blu-ray and what monitors would support playing back from a media box type of delivery.

    -Jason

  • Bram Desmet

    December 9, 2009 at 4:11 am

    Yes, 720 does come in other flavors. 720p24/25/30/50/60. If we were talking about broadcast this would actually be simpler as the number of transmission formats are generally much more limited, but when we start talking about playback from DVD, BluRay, digital media players, etc. these other formats may be more prevalent. Also, you are much more likely to run into 1080p60 with the type of equipment you describe, which again reinforces the idea that it is quite important to list the native resolution along with the frame rate to avoid confusion.

    Bram Desmet
    FSI (Flanders Scientific, Inc.)
    http://www.FlandersScientific.com

  • Jason Brown

    December 9, 2009 at 1:36 pm

    OK…GREAT information…I appreciate it!

    My experience and understanding was that 720p @ 60fps was intended as slo motion footage…it can be played back like that, correct?

    If you play back 60 fps video at 30 (29.97) it will be half speed at 30p, right? That’s always how I’ve seen it used.

    -Jason

  • Richard Herd

    December 10, 2009 at 12:02 am

    It’s also worth keeping in mind the difference between:
    — electronic signal processing &
    — computer programming

    There’s so much information on all of it, it’s hard to know exactly where to start, so here’s a place: https://lurkertech.com/lg/fields/ It’s written from the point of view of a computer programming trying to make software to turn a video signal into a video editing platform (like Final Cut Pro). This guy Mr. Lurkertech wrote specs for QuickTime. He’s an authority worth reading.

  • Jason Brown

    December 10, 2009 at 1:39 am

    Bram mentions later that the format exists of 1080p60 which would be 1920×1080 frame size at 60 progressive frames per second…wouldn’t that essentially kill 720p?

    -Jason

  • Jason Brown

    December 10, 2009 at 1:41 am

    wow…that’s a pretty good read! I’ll take a look at work tomorrow…that may be well above my head! 🙂

    Thanks for the good information…

    Can anyone speak to the idea of using 720 60p as half speed footage? That’s the only application I’ve ever seen it used in…I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone (editing) with 720 at 60 frames per second. (In my small circle of video professionals)

    -Jason

Page 1 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy