Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 14
  • ok ok, we are loosing the point here, and though I agree with walter, it’s irrelevant, the point is to test a glitch, god for bid this NTSC clip isn’t going to broadcast the point is to check this bug

    and I just checked on 5.0.4 and there’s no definition between the two layers, it’s 5.1 thing I thhink

    -Aaron

  • Zander

    August 9, 2006 at 2:24 am in reply to: 3 dimensional nut

    ok, well thats above and beyoond what i was looking for

    my problem is i have the 4 side (left right top and bottom) set up on the ocatagon, but i cant get the the other 4 (top left top right bottom left and bottom right) to be angled correctly and fit

    as for the threads, weel I haven’t been able to get there yet, as im having trouble with the basics here

  • Zander

    August 9, 2006 at 1:23 am in reply to: 3 dimensional nut

    and no it’s 2 octagons with 8 rectangles ion the sides, i was trying to thing of a word to describe the 4 sides, bu i supose a 6 sided nut is more apropriate (thats what I get for trying to make something w/o looking at it)

    https://homepage.mac.com/aaron.zander/FileSharing1.html

    thats what i have so far

  • Zander

    August 9, 2006 at 1:13 am in reply to: 3 dimensional nut

    alo forgot to mension im working in ae7pro with no extra plugins, and im on a power mac g4 12inch power book

  • Zander

    August 8, 2006 at 11:21 pm in reply to: MacPro and Graphics card question

    well the good news is you have time to save

    after effects still does not run on intel computers ecept through roseta which is slower than any computer you could have now

    id say save for both

    but if, in theory, it worked now, it depends if you are getting nucleo or not

  • Zander

    August 8, 2006 at 5:47 am in reply to: 2K Help

    ok well first off, 2k refers to film scanned and a peice of celuliod is a certain aspect ratio neer 4:3 if yo want a 16×9 version at 2048 pixels (which is what 2k is in width) than your hight would be about 2048/1152 (give or take a few pixels on the hight, I’m sure this can be found i just did some basic calculator math)

    the title safe is a reference to something I’m not familiar with but i would trust aftereffect’s general title safe

    hope some one can help with the rest.
    -Zander

  • Zander

    August 1, 2006 at 3:53 am in reply to: T.V. Replacement

    i was just talking to one of my professors, and he recomended not eve green screening and just use tracking dots to place the image (simaler to andrew kramers tutorial)

    would this work (assuming nothing crosses the plane of the TV

  • Zander

    July 22, 2006 at 6:35 pm in reply to: Snapping Frustration and More

    one thing you can do (if you have programable keys or a jog and shuttle wheel like mine from contour) you can progran a button to be reactable i.e press would tap n, release would tap it again. there by creating your much wanted function.

    no to mention the thing speeds me up soo much, worth the 80 bucks. i use it n dozens of programs for different reasons

  • Zander

    July 4, 2006 at 9:28 pm in reply to: to miniture to not

    ok, thanks, i think i need t save my money, shake droped to under 500 bucks (from like 3 grand…) so now i rally ned to save for a computer that can handle it.

    im gonna talk to my director abou our options, thanks a bunch

  • Zander

    July 1, 2006 at 1:11 am in reply to: how to make this effect?

    ya this is def. post motion, leader overlays, billboards wiped, 3d app brought in objects, shatter applied the the first one, and the second one was masked, some of the shots are for sure actually hand held, but the main ones arent

    Aaron Zander
    student editor at brooks institute of photography
    12″powermac g4 1.25gb ram, 1.5 GHZ macosx 10.4.6 1.3tb external space
    finalcut 5.0.4 adobe cs2 afterefects 7pro
    currently working on BombIt: World WIde Graffitit

Page 1 of 14

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy