Forum Replies Created

Page 244 of 285
  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 22, 2011 at 8:20 pm in reply to: Would this be possible as effect.

    Can you explain a bit more what controls you would like for this?

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 21, 2011 at 8:52 pm in reply to: Canon 5d Strobe Light artifact: how to fix?

    [Brian Mulligan] “You can repeat some of the frames to fill in the gaps between bad frames… might be a cool look.”

    Or cut in a frame of white over the top of the offending frames.

    Boy, have you got to love that cool CMOS technology 😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • [Jeremy Garchow] ” I do miss the audio only cross fade, but splitting the a/v and doing two fades is pretty damn easy.”

    Check out Alex Gollner’s audio only transition:

    https://alex4d.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/fcpx-transition-sound-only/

    It works.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 21, 2011 at 5:12 pm in reply to: Separate video and audio dissolves workflow?

    I think what it requires is for someone to make a video only cross dissolve template – not sure if this is possible as I’m not near FCPX/Motion 5 right now, but Brendan will probably have finished one in the time it takes for you to read this.

    Then you could use separate Effects for audio and video and not have to detach the audio. Arguably there’s a way of making separate controls for audio and video within the same template but I think not …

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 20, 2011 at 8:41 pm in reply to: FCP X on Lion vs. Snow Leapord

    Nice test, thanks very much!

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Holy macaroni! Do you never sleep or eat?!

    Another stonker – and it seems like your third of the day already!

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 20, 2011 at 7:52 pm in reply to: Custom Audio-only and Video-only transitions?

    The great Alex Gollner has already written an audio only cross dissolve Effect – search for this on this forum.

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 19, 2011 at 9:19 pm in reply to: What does FCPX teach new editors?

    [Walter Soyka] “A manual transmission exposes the mechanics to the driver — it gives the driver direct control over the relationships between the engine, the gearing, and the car’s movement. It makes the car harder to drive on a basic level, but easier to drive for performance.”

    Yes, that’s what I always thought – until I recently directed some commercials for a Japanese car manufacturer and was told by the client that the automatic version of their top performance car was appreciably faster than the manual even when driven by top professional drivers. Technology has moved ahead of us on this one, apparently.

    I’m not sure what the moral is – except you’re probably right that the car analogy isn’t as helpful as it might be 😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 19, 2011 at 4:48 pm in reply to: What does FCPX teach new editors?

    [Marvin Holdman] “new editors will have to start off learning descriptions of the processes that are COMPLETELY different than current industry standards.”

    Is this really as big a problem as people are making out, I wonder? Many different applications use different names for the same thing but it doesn’t represent a major obstacle to learning them. Are you really not going to be able to move on from FCPX because you once learned that a sequence was a “project”? I somehow doubt it in most cases.

    Not to say that Apple haven’t been particularly daft with their new nomenclature!

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

  • Simon Ubsdell

    July 19, 2011 at 3:51 pm in reply to: NEW FCPX Grunge Opacity Mask

    Yeah, nobody else seems to have seen any mileage in this one but for me it’s the organic effects that I use most of all if I used effects at all. I think this one has lots of possible uses – I like it not just as a frame but also by animating the parameters as a way of fading a shot on and off. But hey, I think I’m very much an MTV generation kind of graphics person who likes it all a bit dirty and knocked about 😉

    Simon Ubsdell
    Director/Editor/Writer
    http://www.tokyo-uk.com

Page 244 of 285

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy