Forum Replies Created

Page 1 of 11
  • Robert Bracken

    August 4, 2017 at 1:33 pm in reply to: Basic text rotation problem

    FYI I found it in After Effects CC 2017 under Text-3D Text- 3D Basic Rotate Y Cascade

    or you can search for “Rot” and it’ll be in there somewhere. Just a suggestion.
    Now I’m having trouble with making it shiney.

  • Robert Bracken

    August 23, 2013 at 6:49 pm in reply to: Converting odd framerates

    How do I learn more about pull down? Where can I see some examples?

  • Robert Bracken

    August 10, 2013 at 1:59 pm in reply to: af100 long zoom lenses

    I have a Panasonic 100-300mm lens. It is a mega ois. The max apature is f4. But you won’t notice it.

    It was a cheap lens at $300. I use it when I’m shooting a meeting at the back of the room, football game or whatever.

    Here’s a video link I found.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgzLfLa2acA

    Some contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!

    This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.

  • Robert Bracken

    August 10, 2013 at 1:55 pm in reply to: 1280 x 1080 Footage???

    Here’s how to import it into Adobe Premiere cs6.
    https://www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/premiere/cs6/pdfs/adobe-premiere-pro-cs6-p2.pdf

    I would always recommend transcoding the footage into what you want. Unless you’re trying to do 60 frames a second then I would bring the footage in through the card structure.

    I used to shoot p2 and had the same issues. So I started transcoding the footage before editing, into full 1920×1080 and everything was groovy.

  • Robert Bracken

    August 10, 2013 at 1:51 pm in reply to: Trouble with the AF100. Should I just give up?

    Thanks for all the help. Right now I’m in the education industry. We were fortunate to get the AF100 now. Hopefully down the road we can get a better processing computer.

    My fix so far is to convert the footage to mpeg. That codec works the best. I don’t do heavy color correcting so I don’t need large files.

    I think that I wasn’t having as many problems as I thought I did. The slow processor made my footage looked like it had a lot of artifacts.

    Thank you for everyone’s help!!! I love this forum.

  • Thank you so much!
    As a convert from FCPX (not by choice) I’m really enjoying Premiere.

  • Robert Bracken

    June 5, 2013 at 2:30 pm in reply to: Split a stereo track into 2 mono tracks
  • Robert Bracken

    May 28, 2013 at 3:52 pm in reply to: Project setting question

    I believe CS6 edits all formats natively, correct?

    Also, I would edit your project first then either export or NEST your sequence into another sized sequence for delivery.

  • Robert Bracken

    May 16, 2013 at 1:59 pm in reply to: Great opening. How can I achieve this look?

    This may have answered my question

    https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/50/860410

    “A filter’s probably faster, but it’s not necessary if you want flexibility. You need to make 3 copies of your image, then isolate the red channel in one, the green in one and the blue in one using something like Channel Mixer on each. Then layer them back together (maybe the Multiply or Add transfer control?) Add a wiggle expression to the anchor point or position of your layers and Viola!

    Channel Blur would be another filter you may want to play around with for other aberration looks. It basically blurs a specific color channel.”

  • As someone forced to use Quantel, Sony Clip Edit and other Enterprise editing systems a BIG MIDDLE FINGER to those pieces of software. (Not the people who developed them. Sorry for being crude.)

    I had to invest my own dollars on Adobe suite of products so my skills wouldn’t suffer and so I could earn jobs outside the workplace.

    The people making the decisions are the people using the equipment and they set my career back by making us use that sorry-stupid software.

    The reason Apple abandoned the Pro users is because sometimes the Pro users don’t have a say in what software to use. With a $299 price point it will get a AWESOME piece of software into more hands.

    Again, sorry for being crude.

Page 1 of 11

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy