Forum Replies Created

Page 15 of 16
  • Joakim Ziegler

    October 25, 2011 at 8:40 pm in reply to: Can I change timecode and DPX #s in Resolve?

    Name Mangler is a decent tool for batch rename operations in Mac OS. Does sequential rename, search and replace in filenames, and a bunch more.

    https://manytricks.com/namemangler/


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    August 24, 2011 at 8:42 pm in reply to: panny

    Rec.709 is nowhere near the size of the P3 space. Rec.709 is missing something like 40% of the P3 space’s colors, if I remember correctly. There’s a pretty big difference.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    August 16, 2011 at 6:59 pm in reply to: Fields

    Ah, yes, if the original is edited in interlace after adding the 3:2 pulldown, you’re in quite a bit more trouble. Of course, telling people they SHOULDN’T DO THAT over and over again doesn’t seem to have much effect, sadly.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    August 14, 2011 at 10:31 pm in reply to: Fields

    Sascha, it seems to me you’re going about this a bit the wrong way. There’s no need for interlace in this case, and in fact any real time conversion will get it wrong.

    What you should be doing is a reverse pulldown on the original material, to get a 23.976 fps progressive stream, and then playing back that stream at 25.00 fps, and separately pitching/stretching the sound to get it to match. That way, you’ll work with progressive frames throughout, and you’ll achieve the maximum possible quality. Just make sure you convert the sound with a high-quality tool. Protools can do this, but there are also several smaller/cheaper utilities that do it.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    August 8, 2011 at 10:23 pm in reply to: technicolor and cinevator

    I have printed to a couple of Cinevators, including the one at Technicolor, are you doing direct to print, or printing to negative? We mostly did direct to print, from log files, and we found the LUT was similar to the one we used for ArriLasers in other places. Of course, to get 100% accuracy, you’d have to profile the Cinevator.

    I haven’t used the Cinevator’s rec.709 mode, but as far as I know, it does have one.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    July 19, 2011 at 9:41 pm in reply to: Extending USB cables (for Wave panels)

    Just beware that the Lindy box is USB1.1, and will thus not be suitable for things like hard drives, etc. (although keyboards, mice, and other HIDs will work fine).


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • David, do you have a reference for these projectors being used as references in post? I’m curious because they seem to be fairly directly aimed at the home theater market.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    June 29, 2011 at 10:02 am in reply to: DaVinci Resolve 8 released and available

    Excellent news! Were there changes from RC1?


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    June 28, 2011 at 1:24 am in reply to: grading projector

    There’s also the ProjectionDesign cineo32, which has rec.709 and is quite cheap (22k dollars or so), or the cineo32 LED, which has DCI gamut, slightly more expensive (27k dollars, I think), but will only get you up to about 120″ diagonal, because of the weaker (but wider-gamut) LED light source.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

  • Joakim Ziegler

    June 13, 2011 at 11:15 pm in reply to: Timeline with mixed progressive and interlaced

    Compressor can actually do a really good job, but it’s a bit slow on the highest quality setting.


    Joakim Ziegler – Postproduction Supervisor

Page 15 of 16

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy