[Simon Ubsdell] “For this reason, I’d hesitate to tell someone that they were “doing it wrong” even if that’s how it seemed to me.”
Complex issue.
In the past I have been told by a poster that my description of the work I was doing was not possible, simply because it was outside of his frame of reference.
On the other hand I worked for years with FCP legacy without knowing that I could set a timeline preference to unlink the video from the audio with the press of a button – I had been selecting all and using a global unlink command till then – Jeremy pointed out that there was a simpler way to do this and he was quite correct and I changed my workflow accordingly.
I once had a heated argument with an editor who claimed that specialized multicam features were not worth using because he could do it all by layering the angles and blade-ing between them. My argument being that there was not a single situation where this was actually faster and that he was doing his assistants a disservice by teaching them only his method.
My personal workflow is quite unique and while I teach it to my assistants I always acknowledge that I am marching to a beat quite outside the industry norms. I think my way is best, otherwise I wouldn’t pursue it, but I’m loath to tell others it will be best for them. I do think it’s always wise to show others a different way to skin the cat and then leave them free to choose, but in some instances, as with multicam editing, I will insist that some workflows are just down right inefficient.
You are correct that the subtleties of a given workflow can’t be comprehended without working within it, but sometimes editors come up with inefficient ways of working thru ignorance. I would suggest that presenting options is never a bad thing, as long as it’s done with some humility.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin\’ attached to nothin\’
\”Deciding the spine is the process of editing\” F. Bieberkopf