Forum Replies Created

Page 19 of 35
  • Dom Silverio

    September 27, 2005 at 5:10 am in reply to: Migrating FCP to Avid

    Uhm… he asked specific questions not relating to Avid vs FCP. The others pulled that one from him – and he is a troll? Mark – let us be fair. He did say he is no expert and he is very clear (line by line) on his needs/wants. Relax Mark.

  • Dom Silverio

    September 26, 2005 at 2:52 pm in reply to: For those of you in LA 23.976fps vs. 24fps

    In NYC anytime soon?

    🙂

    Have yet to attend one of your seminars Michael.

  • Dom Silverio

    September 14, 2005 at 7:26 pm in reply to: when to use a 24p or 23.976 project

    The choice also exist on newer Meridien (version 12) and Symphony systems.

    It all comes down to how the audio is recorded.

    Read Michael Phillip’s (of Avid) article for EGM –

    https://www.editorsguild.com/newsletter/MayJun04/mayjun04_23-24_proj.htm

  • Dom Silverio

    September 12, 2005 at 5:04 pm in reply to: iTunes Store purchased file into Media Composer?

    Its copy protected. You will not be able to do what you want.

  • Its true. No point of messing around with the wrong OS.

  • Dom Silverio

    September 9, 2005 at 1:39 pm in reply to: Adrenaline Codec

    I would use Animation codec for delivery. It does create large files but guarantees great quality – no matter the platform. And it prevents the client from coming back to you about recompression.

  • Dom Silverio

    September 8, 2005 at 8:10 pm in reply to: Adrenaline Codec

    There is no Adrenaline codec per se. For SD, Adrenaline uses Meridien based compression and DV25/DV50. Just download the Meridien codec –
    https://www.avid.com/onlineSupport/supportcontent.asp?browse=&productID=0&contentID=3555

    For HD, it uses DNxHD and DVC Pro HD. These are not available for Macs.

  • Dom Silverio

    September 7, 2005 at 1:17 am in reply to: FCP BMD / Avid comparison

    [Chill] “Um, I’m not sure where to begin with that. I don’t know about you, but in my world,”

    Why not use the deck? It is pointless to tie up a system just to black the tape. I mean there so many other features you can discuss.

    Yes QT is easier to generate with FCP, but FCP is horrendous for media management. So that is a give and in my opion a lot of take.

    Rendering in Avid is actually smarter. You can view lower tracks without losing render files. You can mix media types in the timeline. Working in 24p/film is easier. Real time moving alpha channels. Better motion FX control. Better color correction. etc.

    But yes you have some valid claims. However, the biggest and I think the most valid is FCP’s affordability to move from DV all the way up to uncompress HD. The rest of you the technical stuff? It depends…

    .02

  • Dom Silverio

    September 6, 2005 at 4:49 am in reply to: Edit Final Cut Pro captured files in AVID?

    Being QT does not guarantee you the ability to import them in to a PC Avid. You need to check the codec. Not all QT codecs are available in the PC – like DV50 and Apple’s uncompress.
    Also, you may have to go through recompression in order to work with it.

    Usually, batch capture would be a better route – unless working with DV25 material.

  • Dom Silverio

    August 30, 2005 at 5:58 pm in reply to: Best Avid Plugins?

    Boris CC, Genarts Sapphire, 3Prongs’ various AVX, DFT 55mm and finally Elastic Gasket from Profound.

Page 19 of 35

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy