[Zvi Twersky]

I once had that problem. It is depending on how the camera was set when shooting. It’s a problem with the raw footage and not premiere. Anyhow, this is what I did that helped: (I use PPRO 2)

1. Right click a clip and choose “field options”. (This will only work on a source clip and not a clip from a nested sequence).
2. Choose “flicker removal” and OK.

That’s it. Hope it helps.

[Zvi Twersky]

Yes, I arranged folders and drives. I made one HDD for rendered stuff, one for source stuff etc…

I am doing lots of weddings, Bat\Bar Mitzvahs and events that all have the same pattern and that why I wanted presets. Also, I don’t get paid by the hour but by the project so even if I always a lot more then I need to (Like you said, I’m learning creativity), I still need tips to make things go faster.

Since most weddings can use the same music I choose, I already have an empty project with all the music set with markers at the beats and this is a big time saver.

[Zvi Twersky]

Thanks, but the problem was I wasn’t opening projects with MATROX. Now it works.

[Zvi Twersky]

Thanks so much! Yes that worked!

But on the newer computer, we have a newer Matrox, (I think it’s called RX-200 instead of RX-100) and there are SO many more effects! Is there any way to add these effects so that the RX-100 will recognize them? When I open a project I made in Matrox RX-200 on the newer computer, it says that it’s missing filters (effects).

Thank you!

[Zvi Twersky]

I just work here. I’m not the boss. 🙂

[Zvi Twersky]

I’ve seen other ones that had transitions that whould make the picture turn into a baby boddle or make a picture go into a TV screen and things like that. Mainly good for photo montages. Any ideas what does this?

[Zvi Twersky]

All I know is that it was shot with a HD camera, Widescreen, 29.97 30i. The 1280X720 is what Premiere is telling me that my footage is.

[Zvi Twersky]

Thanks guys!

So it’s just wierd that the footage that was shot says 1.0 (It was HD)

[Zvi Twersky]

I don’t understand your answer. Did you not read my post? Do you think I don’t know that i means interlaced? I wrote that I know that shooting interlaced video means shooting fields and not frames.

I read more then enough and watched hours of tutorials and my main question is technicaly what does it mean to shoot interlaced fields and not interlaced frames? The interlaced lines make a field!

It seems that there are THREE kinds of shooting:
1. progressive (eg: film, cameras that support it)
2. What every other camera shoots in (I thought interlaced)
3. “i”… interlaced

What is the difference between 2 and 3?

Thank you.

[Zvi Twersky]

I’d like to take this question one step further… If the answer is YES, this will be a HUGE time saver for me!

I tried a test… I took a clip and put it into sequence01. I did NOT render it. Then I nested the UNrendered clip into sequence02 and rendered the nesting sequence.

What happens is, sequence02 gets rendered and sequence01 doesn’t! So my question is, if I am anyways only going to export the nesting sequence at the end (the nesting sequence will have all my other sequences in it) Is it enough to just render the final nesting sequence and export it? What I’ve been doing until now is first rendering each sequence and THEN rendering again the nesting sequence that has all these other sequences.

Thanks!