Forum Replies Created

Page 3 of 3
  • Zach Rutledge

    September 29, 2008 at 9:17 pm in reply to: de interlace filter sucks !!!

    Uh, do you believe me now??

  • Zach Rutledge

    September 29, 2008 at 9:09 pm in reply to: de interlace filter sucks !!!

    Yes, as I stated in the first post, I have tried all the plugins mentioned with no luck.

    You are looking at a fully rendered 720×486 image. Everything is 100%.

    We have tried using the magic bullet deartifacter along with the de-interlacer in FCP with no luck as well.

    If you blend the fields you run into problems with motion and if you use some of the others mentioned you get this ghosting effect.

    Any other suggestions?

  • Zach Rutledge

    September 29, 2008 at 8:28 pm in reply to: de interlace filter sucks !!!

    The part of the pictures I wanted everyone to look at was the amount of artifacting going on around shoulders, heads, things like that. The quality level which seems to drop in using the de-interlace. I guess the questions are, what should be the best settings in in FCP, my camera and my AJA Kona set-up to prevent this from happening?

  • Zach Rutledge

    September 29, 2008 at 8:24 pm in reply to: de interlace filter sucks !!!

    I always view my footage on an external monitor, trust me, it looks exactly the same as it does in the picture.

  • Zach Rutledge

    September 29, 2008 at 7:38 pm in reply to: de interlace filter sucks !!!

    I am having the same problems with my footage. I shoot on a SDX900 in the 24P mode. Capturing SDI in uncompressed 8 bit using a Kona LHe card from a AJ-SD93 Deck.

    I have two images to show.

    The first is of the original footage without using the de-interlace feature in FCP.

    The Second is after the de-interlace is applied.

    As you can see the artifacting going on is extremely bad and after playing with other plugins to try to fix this, I am getting no better results. Could this be my capture set up or an in camera problem?

    Any help is appreciated.

  • Zach Rutledge

    May 6, 2008 at 4:08 pm in reply to: UPRESING

    I am. My real question is, is what I have heard about Final Cut’s new ability to upres without loss in quality and no longer needing third party plugins true?

  • Zach Rutledge

    May 6, 2008 at 3:37 pm in reply to: UPRESING

    I am using ReSizer to change DV 4:3 footage to 16:9 and I am not seeing much, if any, of a quality difference between just using Final Cut to blow the image up. I had heard that Final Cut 6 was really good at doing this and you did not need to buy third party plugins. Is this the case?

  • Zach Rutledge

    February 14, 2008 at 8:01 pm in reply to: time lapse day to night

    I actually did this back in October with a skyline shot of our city of Indianapolis. I blew out the iris to let the sky catch up to the camera and used an intravalometer in our SDX-900 set to 1 frame every 20 seconds. It was a great in-camera effect that required no time re-mapping on my part.

  • That must be it. When I do my color correction I always put what I use in my favorites folder. Thanks I will stop doing that and see what happpens.

  • I am the admin user and I am not trashing my permissions unless that is a setting that can be checked and if it is how do I uncheck it 😀

Page 3 of 3

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy