Forum Replies Created

Page 12 of 15
  • You can try dupliucating the channels and stacking if you need more volume,
    but you will of course add a alot of ambient noise.

    Take the modified segments into STP, select an area with a lot of noise and no vocals, then
    select process “set noise print”, then select all the noisy segments and apply process->reduce noise then adjust to your liking. Not ideal, but should help some.

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • >>drop a wireless lav on the groom’s lapel
    …just make sure the groom turns it off before and after the ceremony. 🙂

    You could also just do some ADR on it. 🙂
    Would be hilarious in a bloopers section.
    Make it sound like a quality kung-fu movie.

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • Will Griffith

    August 27, 2007 at 3:39 pm in reply to: FCP won’t open after electrical storm

    Your ethernet board has been fried.

    This makes the machine lose its MAC(machine) address(es).
    Final cut and most other pro apps use your machine address
    to searialize the liscense. No MAC address….no FCP.

    Your best bet is to take it to the Apple Store and say “my ethernet ports
    are not working” and hope they don’t ask you any more questions.
    They will need to replace the entire logic board.

    sorry.

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • Will Griffith

    August 15, 2007 at 12:10 pm in reply to: G5 vs. MacBook Pro

    Just using a Quad G5 and a 2.2Ghz Cor Duo MacBook Pro last night side by side I noticed
    that disk speed makes a pretty big difference when editing in FCP. The Quad G5 wins hands
    down IMO.

    Now compressor on the other hand… I think is tailored to Intel chips because the MacBook Pro
    is easily 50% faster encoding the same clips.

    After Effects (CS3) is faster rendering on the MacBook as well. It stinks that they did not write
    the software to take advantage of G5 multicore processors.

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • Will Griffith

    July 11, 2007 at 4:10 pm in reply to: 24p with new canon cameras

    #1 priority – get the shot. With anything “live” make sure it is lit well and do not
    make any camera moves which distract from the event.

    #1a – Get EXCELLENT audio. Moving lips is not enough.

    After you have all of this covered then you can worry about making it filmic or not.

    I would just suggest using a filmic custom preset for the coloring and leave it in 60i.
    Later on the couple may want the original tapes and it will be really tough for them
    to play back 24f in anything.

    The couple will be tearing up later because of what happened that day, not that it’s filmic
    (even if 24p is more dramatic…which it is).

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • Will Griffith

    July 11, 2007 at 3:59 pm in reply to: New FINAL CUT STUDIO 2 does not support XH A1

    Easy Setup “HDV 1080p 24”.
    Or use “HDV 1080i60” if using 60i or 30p.

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • Will Griffith

    July 11, 2007 at 2:52 pm in reply to: dots dash dot dot dash

    In your final output timeline you could also just apply a couple pixel black matte to the area
    if you don’t want to crop everything.

    Will Griffith
    Producer/Editor

  • Will Griffith

    June 21, 2007 at 1:34 pm in reply to: Accidental Canon XL-H1 24f footage

    True, but It is a little harder to notice if it is an interview, etc.
    Hopefully some creative editing will solve the problem. 🙂

  • Will Griffith

    June 21, 2007 at 12:27 pm in reply to: Accidental Canon XL-H1 24f footage

    It is a lot easier to make 60i look like 24f.
    If it is narrative then I would go that route.

    If it is sports or fast action then it will be tough,
    especially if it was shot at a slow shutter of 48, etc.
    If it was 60 or higher then it may mix ok, but it depends
    on what the footage looks like, how many pans, hand held,
    etc.

    You should be able to just capture as 1080 60i HDV
    if you want to go that route.

  • Will Griffith

    June 8, 2007 at 3:21 pm in reply to: Any happy users of FCS2?

    Overall – Impressed
    Overall On Quad Intels (3ghz w/ATI 1900) – Super Impressed.
    Overall On Quad G5 2.5 – Impressed, but miffed about ProRes Capture

    FCP – Seems even more solid, love the multiformat timeline and other little things
    Motion – Really starting to come into its own. Tracking tool needs some work.
    Compressor – Love the new layout but Qmaster and multi machine rendering is JUNK.
    (#1 thing I want fixed)
    Soundtrack – haven’t messed with it much yet
    Color – Wow. Absolutely screams through uncompressed 1080p stuff we have. Love it.

    It just irritates me that something we’ve been waiting on (Compressor render farm) is
    just not there yet. We could be using this NOW, and I really wish they could get it right.

Page 12 of 15

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy