Forum Replies Created

Page 52 of 85
  • Tom Brooks

    January 20, 2008 at 5:35 pm in reply to: Uncompressed 8 bit real time

    Never heard of it. Interesting.

  • [rob norris] “First question is what is the best way to take this 24p HD footage and export at 29.97 fps, keeping the 23.98 fps look, for on-air?”

    The first step in the workflow is to capture in HDV 1080i. Done. Skip the rest. Edit. Output 1080i. You’re there.

  • Tom Brooks

    January 19, 2008 at 2:21 pm in reply to: DVD from P2 Footage Just Shot

    Exabyte has a FW800 external tape backup device that some folks have pointed to. It’s about $1200–cheap. Trouble is, it’s pretty slow. I believe the transfer rate is 6MB per second. That sounds like about 44 minutes per 16GB card. Ugh. The cartridges are not entirely cheap either.

    Jan Crittendon Livingston from Panasonic, has mentioned using a RAID-1 removable drive setup. The idea being you backup to two hard drives at once and then swap out the drives and store them when they’re full. One hard drive sitting on the shelf seems awfully risky–two is safer. Wiebetech has a really cool trayless removable drive system that would be a dream for this kind of thing. What do you think of this?

    https://www.wiebetech.com/products/RTX200.php#pricingavailability

  • Tom Brooks

    January 17, 2008 at 1:57 pm in reply to: Setting up A Raid system

    I’ve gotten a lot of good info from the reviews on AMUG.org and BareFeats. Then look at the sites of major manufacturers–G-Tech, Sonnet, Cal-Digit, LaCie. Adaptec has great information about the different kinds of RAIDs and the advantages of each.

    https://www.adaptec.com/en-US/products/raid/_education/RAID_level_compar_wp.htm

    A major consideration is the bus you will need to connect to and what other equipment needs bandwidth on the computer’s busses. So, will you go with a RAID that connects via FireWire or via SATA?

    Other major topic is what flavor of RAID and how big does it need to be. I could assume you want a two-drive RAID-0 system, but maybe not.

  • Tom Brooks

    January 16, 2008 at 3:49 pm in reply to: RAID 3 or 5?

    The thread started out with mostly misinformation. It’s better now.

  • Tom Brooks

    January 16, 2008 at 4:02 am in reply to: RAID 3 or 5?

    Got it. That covers all the bases.

  • Tom Brooks

    January 16, 2008 at 2:04 am in reply to: RAID 3 or 5?

    [walter biscardi] “If it’s fast enough, RAID 5. You give up an entire drive, but it’s total and instant redundancy. At least on our systems it is.”

    Total? RAID-5 can withstand one drive failure without losing the volume. So, with one failed drive, you’re vulnerable–just as vulnerable as you would be with RAID-0 or no RAID at all. That’s why it’s good to have a hot spare with RAID-5 and a controller that can automatically rebuild using the spare. RAID card manufacturers state that you still need a backup with RAID-5 if your data is irreplaceable.

    Regarding the “instant” part, the RAID will perform at reduced speed if one drive fails. If you have a lot of drives in the set, you’re going to have speed to burn, but it will still be slower until the failed drive is replaced and the RAID is rebuilt after a couple hours or so.

  • Tom Brooks

    January 9, 2008 at 5:50 pm in reply to: artifact not on camera, just in FCPro

    From what display is your “After” frame grab taken? It appears to be the Canvas of FCP. The Canvas cannot properly display interlaced (60i) video. You must view it on a regular TV or NTSC monitor to properly judge the quality.

  • Tom Brooks

    January 6, 2008 at 11:34 pm in reply to: LCD and Plasma monitor calibration

    It only has to be big enough to cover your eye, yeah?

  • Tom Brooks

    January 4, 2008 at 1:15 pm in reply to: Converting AVI 720×486 to 720×480 DVCPro50

    Great workaround. This could come in handy for a lot of people.

Page 52 of 85

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy