Shane Ross
Forum Replies Created
-
That is a Paint Effect we use in an Avid. I use that on a few shows myself.
yes, blur across is good, in combination with Joe’s Chroma glow. You will need to razor 15 frames of each clip, add teh chroma glow, keyframe it, then add the blur across.
-
That is a Paint Effect we use in an Avid. I use that on a few shows myself.
yes, blur across is good, in combination with Joe’s Chroma glow. You will need to razor 15 frames of each clip, add teh chroma glow, keyframe it, then add the blur across.
-
That is a Paint Effect we use in an Avid. I use that on a few shows myself.
yes, blur across is good, in combination with Joe’s Chroma glow. You will need to razor 15 frames of each clip, add teh chroma glow, keyframe it, then add the blur across.
-
Can’t do it. You need to adjust the speed first.
You also can’t drop a clip in the same spot and have the effects from the clip you are replacing then apply to the new clip.
-
You gain nothing my capturing DV at 8-bit or 10-bit resolution, other than increase ability to green screen and the fact that any graphics you add to the project will look better. In fact, if you capture DV at 8-bit or 10-bit you are slightly COMPRESSING the image. The only true lossless way of capturing DV is via firewire using the DV/NTSC (or PAL) presets. Capturing 8 or 10-bit for color correction won’t improve things, I’m afraid.
DV is, by nature, compressed 5:1 in the camera. If the artifact is on the tape, it will be on the captured footage. Garbage in, garbage out as the saying goes.
-
Shane Ross
September 8, 2005 at 6:45 am in reply to: pro’s and cons of both 23.98 and 29,97 in one sequence?Yes, they both can be reverse telecined to run at 23.98. 24PA is designed to be used ONLY for 23.98, while 24P is designed to run at both 29.97 and 23.98
Shane’s Stock Answer #23
Quoting Ken Stone’s site found at:
https://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/24p_in_FCP_nattress.html
24p Normal
When shooting in 24p Normal, the camera is adding normal standard 3:2 pulldown to the video, which results in 24p footage designed to work with any non-linear editing suite and it will play back and look good directly to any NTSC monitor. You can use 24p Normal footage just like normal video from any DV camera, and everything will work fine, but obviously, the footage will have a film look to it. If you -
Shane Ross
September 8, 2005 at 2:22 am in reply to: pro’s and cons of both 23.98 and 29,97 in one sequence?24P or 24PA? 24P runs at 29.97 fps. it just is progressive and simulates a 24fps frame rate.
What is your ultimate output going to be? Tape? Then 29.97. DVD? Film? Web? Then edit 23.98.
-
Yes. By using the Media Manager.
-
What kind of footage will you be working with? DV only? Then a G5, good LCD monitor, NTSC monitor for color correction, DVCAM Deck, G-Raid FW-800 hard drives.
BetaSP, Digibeta, any other analoge format…gonna need a capture card like the Decklink series or AJA series, and an external SATA array, and decks, or course.
HD…are you even going here?
-
This sounds like quite a mess. The big issue will come with needing PAL footage in an NTSC cut, or Vice Versa, and then needing it in both formats. If you convert PAL to NTSC to work with and deliver an NTSC cut, then convert it BACK to PAL, it will look horrible, or at least odd.
Here is my suggestion.
Convert everything into ONE format. What will your final master be? HD? SD? Figure this out because you will have to capture the DVCPRO HD and downconvert to DV, or UPconvert the DV to DVCPRO HD. Capture everything offline RT to edit with. Use the StandardsConverter from http://www.nattress.com to convert the PAL footage to NTSC. Edit. When you are done, then re-capture everything (using a capture card) as either 8-bit uncompressed SD or 4:2:2 HD, depending on your final format needs. When you get the master, then use the Standards converter again to convert to the other format, PAL for example.