Forum Replies Created

Page 99 of 137
  • [Tim Wilson] “So, provocatively, what’s your take on this?”

    Seriously? Again? Oi! 😉

    One guy’s opinion and one guy only. YMMV.

    sw

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 26, 2014 at 1:53 pm in reply to: Duet Display

    Thanks. I have a small edit to do today and will download it and give it a try.

    Scott

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 25, 2014 at 3:03 pm in reply to: Duet Display

    Yeah, I just want the Libraries/Event/Projects on the iPad monitor. Well, it’s Christmas, so it looks like I need a gift!

    Happy-happy, y’all!

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 24, 2014 at 12:59 pm in reply to: You’d better watch, you’d better not cry…..

    [Bob Woodhead] “OK, got it. Don’t plug in any T-bolt drives with “Property of Kim Jong-un” stenciled on it.”

    oh, now you’ve done it! 😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 17, 2014 at 3:12 pm in reply to: Quantifiable evidence

    [Aindreas Gallagher] “honest to god but come on. who doesn’t know where ppro has gone?”

    Gee Aindreas, I guess I am the last to know. PP in CS6 is not a good editor (imho). Slow, clunky compared to X. Bins? Tracks? Slows the process way down in comparison. I use X on a daily basis and when I have to hop over to PP, I feel like I am stuck in mud. I have no incentive to move forward with PP unless CC is MUCH better and there was a demand for me to be using it. My clients allow me to use what I feel is best for them.

    I don’t use Photoshop or AE enough to subscribe and take on PP as an afterthought part of the package. CS6 is adequate for the light use I give them. Therefore my question. Maybe there is a free trial of CC I can try, but there seems to be no pressing need to do it.

    I also have no real interest in what ITV and other large scale broadcast chop-shops use. That niche means nothing to my niche as that workflow means nothing to mine.

    😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 17, 2014 at 2:40 pm in reply to: Evidently, some of this is quantified.

    Interesting. I can’t remember the last time I was in a movie theater.

    sw

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 17, 2014 at 2:35 pm in reply to: This is when it all changed …

    Apple? 😉

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 17, 2014 at 1:24 pm in reply to: AVCHD from C100 in FCPX

    Hey Jonathan –

    I was cutting yesterday on C100 footage and it looked just fine on the output. Like Noah said, check if you accidentally created proxy media on the input.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Scott Witthaus

    December 16, 2014 at 11:34 pm in reply to: Quantifiable evidence

    How different is CC from CS6? I find PP in CS6 to be a pain. I use it only when I have to (clients shop).

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

  • Thanks all! Appreciate the tips.

    Scott Witthaus
    Senior Editor/Post Production Supervisor
    1708 Inc./Editorial
    Professor, VCU Brandcenter

Page 99 of 137

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy