–When will our “tightly integrated applications” actually use the same keyboard shortcuts, –related concepts, similar terminology and file save boxes?
I think Apple’s “suite” suffers from the same problem The Avid “suite” suffers from. Both companies bought a bunch of single app companies that had some software technology they though they could “fit” into their toolset. Since they weren’t written from the ground up, they only took on a percentage of the Apple look and feel. Also explains the dialog box issues. Apple’s integration is a bit better IMO.
–Why aren’t roundtrips between these “tightly integrated” apps total no-brainers like they –are in Adobe CS2 or CS3?
Honestly I think Adobe really has some crack programmers and really think about workflow…Apple really wants you to buy a new G5. And another one next year…and an iPod and a phone. Adobe sells software. They write better software. Not sure I would say that about Premier…but.
–Why didn’t LiveType become a real Macintosh application or get the merciful death it
–deserves?
I have actually wondered this myself…how DOES it fit in? Sure takes a ton of space to install if you load all the fonts. Who is using it in a professional setting? Why not roll some of the features into the text tool and call it a day?
–Phooey. This is a 5.6 rev, not a legitimate upgrade. It’s nothing but v5.5 with a sloppy, –thin coat of gloss.
Haven’t really jumped in yet, but I think most of the new stuff ended up in Motion and Color. Kind of agree that that might constitute “gloss” as he suggests. I have not heard of any new major revelations on basic workflow additions…things like the digitize window, bin sifting, better keyframing of effects, just some nice surprises in the basic interface. Not much that I have read here. But as I said, have yet to really give it a go.
I spent a couple thousand dollars getting three suites up and running with upgrades and a new package…So far I would agree that it is a pretty “gloss” upgrade…
Rich Rubasch
Tilt Media