[Byron Caplan]“btw- the transfer happens a lot faster with this setting.”
Right.
There is not any kind of transcoding/processing. The original video/audio info is re-packed in a new QT “container” instead of the MXF.
rafael
[Shane Ross]“Yup. The camera shoots XDCAM, and that has a much lower data rate than ProRes 422. I wonder if you can use the Canon XF Transfer utility to re-wrap these as QT…then you’ll have QT XDCAM, much lighter than ProRes.”
That should be the way to go.
Fast and keep the original files/size.
rafael
That “iOrg..” converter doesn’t looks much professional, and if is unable of dealing with the audio, is proving that is not an option for production.
Here you have the answer: https://forums.creativecow.net/thread/8/1178238#1178256
rafael
That question have been asked MANY times on this forum and this is the first the first positive answer I’ve read. In 10 years I’ve never paid attention to that option.
Great FC, it bring solutions for everybody even after dead.
rafael
[Ken Nicholson]“There not even close to being the same thing yet… absolutely no rendering needed at all. Edit To Tape goes right off without rendering at all.”
Sorry, but that’s impossible.
Whatever you put on a time-line will be rendered to the sequence setting, unless already match the sequence settings.
rafael