[Peter Tours]

I sent an email to support@borisfx.com with the clip. Please check out how the logo is effected on – that’s the wipe, but it does so much more.

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

Sorry, no. I wish I still had a copy of 2.53 so I could show you. I believe it was called light wipe or light wedge or wedge wipe…

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

Hi Peter – I think it was called “Light Wipe” and lived in the wipes section. YOu could do a “laser from one end to another, wipe to and from center (or positionable) with doors or a circle pattern choosable.

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

It Red 5 going to be 10.6.x only?

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

That’s just what I did, because Red so so great! Perhaps consider incoporating into Red 5? When the digit’s change from 3 to 4, it gets a little tricking making the $ tracking look clean, but it works. Thanks for getting back to me.

I use Red in my FCP timeline – a lot. Any chance 5 will render faster?

Cheers!

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

As the editor, I assume these are camera settings? I am getting the camera for the weekend so I can experiment (ok, play).

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

Shane – I have a Kona LHe so I already had the utility. Here are the results using DVCPRO HD 720p60 frame size:

File Size Sweep
MB MB/sec

• Read Write
• 128.0 204.3 203.4
• 256.0 199.3 165.1
• 512.0 183.5 166.4
• 1024.0 192.5 176.8
• 2048.0 193.3 181.0
• 4096.0 196.1 174.0
• 8192.0 196.6 178.0
• 16384.0 197.3 177.9

I am having trouble formatting it for the cow. but the first column is file size, then next to it read speed followed by write speed.

Clearly better than 100mb/s required for DVCPRO HD but nowhere near 300mb/s rating – but certainly more than adequate.

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

Besides the fact that I own it, I don’t suppose I can come up with a great reason. But that said, doesn’t it enhance a raid set with additional memory or buffering (or something) that would justify keeping it in there?

Do you think there would be any difference between:

a. leaving things as they are now
b. pull the card and use DU to make a new raid 0 set of bays 2-4
c. leave everything as it is but move the system drive to an optical bay

Thanks

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

Bob – do you have an opinion on my configuration?

I think I just had an epiphany and figured out I may be causing a problem based on my overall configuration.

I was staring at Disk Utility a little while ago and it hit me…I use bay 1 for my system disc and bays 2-4 for my media – the raid card should only be controlling bays 2-4. But it naturally controls all 4 bays – that has got to be

I think I should move my system disc to an optical bay. What do you think??

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL

[Peter Tours]

I think I just had an epiphany and figured out I may be causing a problem based on my overall configuration.

I was staring at Disk Utility a little while ago and it hit me…I use bay 1 for my system disc and bays 2-4 for my media – the raid card should only be controlling bays 2-4. But it naturally controls all 4 bays – ergo I am causing my own problems

I think I should move my system disc to an optical bay. What do you think??

Peter Tours
TnT Video Services, Inc.
Fort Lauderdale, FL