[Jeremy Garchow] “I’m not saying it’s not preventable, but as more and more people get used to getting more and more updates, and those updates contain more and more content and not just bug fixes, this seems to perpetuate the beta state.”
And that’s the thing there Jeremy. It’s not (nor should it be) perpetual beta anymore. It can and should be a brand new release with features and fixes released with absolute confidence that it will do what it’s supposed to do. If it’s two releases in the month of May and not another til July then that’s 3 releases that quarter. Not 3 beta iterations of what you first got in March. Any CTO will tell you he wants more developers more than anything. Not because he needs more people to fix all things that are wrong, but because he wants more people to make more and better products (through software) so they can be current and a leader in their business.
More and more people ARE getting used to it because more and more people DEMAND it. And they should.
On this very FCPX forum there’s a thread about when is the next update and what we all hope it will contain, while Adobe can tell you when the next update is coming and what’s going to be in it. That doesn’t make the current version of FCPX et al and CC beta versions. But it is pretty illustrative of different development methodologies in action.