Forum Replies Created

Page 17 of 74
  • Paul Dickin

    June 21, 2011 at 4:28 pm in reply to: OMF and AAF Export via Automatic Duck

    Hi
    https://www.philiphodgetts.com/2011/06/what-are-the-answers-to-the-unanswered-questions-about-final-cut-pro-x/
    Apple folk made it abundantly clear that the ecosystem was very important to them, and that there will be a new, and much improved, replacement for the current XML workflow.

  • Paul Dickin

    June 21, 2011 at 3:24 pm in reply to: With more media downloads as well?
  • Paul Dickin

    June 20, 2011 at 10:03 pm in reply to: Thunderbolt on existing 12-Core

    [Aaron Robinson] “Thoughts please?”
    Hi
    Will our thoughts make Apple completely re-engineer the Mac Pro motherboard to include the TB chip (which has to have a direct connection to the CPU/chipset – and the graphics card) a matter of months before a new CPU socket will be introduced by Intel?
    Will our thoughts change Intel’s plans for the introduction date of their next multi-processor Xeon which plugs into that socket?

  • Paul Dickin

    June 20, 2011 at 7:28 am in reply to: The future of QuickTime?

    Hi
    Yes, there has been some discussion in this forum, in between other more speculative topics 😉
    The new replacement is called AV Foundation.

    Discussion here has mostly been based on the investigative diggings of Philip Hodgetts:

    https://www.philiphodgetts.com/2011/02/what-is-apple-doing-with-quicktime/
    https://www.philiphodgetts.com/2011/04/what-ive-been-saying-about-final-cut-pro-av-foundation-and-quicktime/

    Here’s the Apple documantation:
    https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/#documentation/AudioVideo/Conceptual/AVFoundationPG/Articles/00_Introduction.html

  • Paul Dickin

    June 18, 2011 at 3:10 pm in reply to: Audio Filters: Apple vs Final Cut Pro

    Hi
    The Apple filters are Audio Units OS plug-ins , available to any Mac program, like Soundtrack Pro or Logic Studio. Other programs often have a much better easier graphical user interface to apply the filters than FCP allows.

  • Paul Dickin

    June 18, 2011 at 1:31 pm in reply to: Hysteria

    [Dennis Radeke] “…all of the other companies are doing much the same…”
    Hi
    Adobe yes.
    I don’t know anything about Avid.
    It remains to be seen whether Adobe’s cross-platform Windows/OS X implementation running on a Mac is as elegant as Apple’s. 😉

  • Paul Dickin

    June 18, 2011 at 1:15 pm in reply to: Hysteria

    Hi
    What’s with the ‘no timeline in FCP X’ notion?

    What Apple seem to be doing (if you read their developer documentation for AV Frameworks) is making the timeline (seen in the program’s GUI) an AV Mutable Composition. At OS (= AV Frameworks) level.

    That means FCP X is ‘only’ the GUI. Any other GUI – call it Motion or Soundtrack or Color, whatever – can have direct and maybe simultaneous access to the AV Frameworks assets that comprise your work-in-progress ‘edit.

    No round-tripping (or tripping 😉 ). Just enhanced tools for enhanced productivity, once the full suite is all developed. 🙂

    Add that to extensively developed and pervasive metadata databasing, again at OS system leve,l for accessibility to any GUI running…
    Big deal.

  • Paul Dickin

    June 18, 2011 at 9:35 am in reply to: Hysteria

    [David Cherniack] “…incremental improvements. They didn’t change how humans interact…”
    Hi
    The medieval monks sorted out books – binding, pages to be turned with their written word on, inset illustrations etc. Along came Gutenberg and Caxton and made no changes to the human>book paradigm.

    Not a big deal?

  • Paul Dickin

    June 17, 2011 at 10:12 pm in reply to: Hysteria

    [David Cherniack] “The automobile achieved architectural stabilization by its first two decades and improvements ever since have been incremental…”
    Hi
    It was more like 50 years before monocoque constructtion and traction-avant (FWD), which are crucial to the modern evolved motor car.

    The monocoque analogy is apt. Hitherto Apple, Avid and Adobe have been ‘coach-builders’, building their bespoke bodywork (= the visible part of the car) on the chassis of the underlying OS.

    Apple has chucked that out, and is apparently about to integrate the application directly into the OS’s core underpinnings.

    What was a big deal for the automobile, leading to greatly enhanced structural stability and road-holding (= performance) will be a ‘big deal’ in NLE performance terms.

  • Paul Dickin

    June 16, 2011 at 9:38 pm in reply to: Larry Jordan speaks about FCPX

    [Simon Ubsdell] “What’s the story there?”
    Hi
    The story – as Randy showed it – is that some of the concepts in FCP X’s GUI, and some of the basic functionality, has been tried and tested (in iMovie as it happens) – but it goes far far beyond that…

    The story as Phil tells it is that now all this preliminary work is coming to fruition in a new application built on a new ‘engine’ which will be radically different from what we have known so far, and will have huge potential for the future.

Page 17 of 74

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy