Mitch Ives
Forum Replies Created
-
[Walter Soyka] “It seems the consensus is that FCP7 will kick around for another year or two, so there may still be a good market for Baselight for FCP in the short term.”
To use a literary quote, perhaps “The rumors of my death have been greatly exaggerated”…
— signed FCSMitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
Mitch Ives
December 23, 2011 at 3:35 pm in reply to: Events and Projects Librarys Missing in FCPX (but folders and videos in finder exist)[Bill Davis] “If I read all the threads correctly, it seems this isn’t actually a Final Cut Pro issue so much as an underliing Unix file tree issue.
Perhaps, but I don’t think so. The only issues with UNIX involve the use of punctuation in the filename. All of these words can be used in file names and work fine under FCS, AE, Motion etc. It’s FCPX that seems to be having some kind of issue with some aspect of this.
[Bill Davis] It starts with the poor practice of doing FINDER copies of card data that creates essentially false directory tree branches that X “thinks” leads to cards – but don’t.
How can the program tell whether a particular DCIM file is a proper camera clip or a finder tag for an asset collection? My brain can supply context based on where amongst the thousands of possibilities I put it – but I don’t think the computer’s directory is going to parse that.
So those of use who have been using card based cameras longer than you and doing finder copies without any issues are suddenly wrong. Okay…
[Bill Davis] Bottom line. Archives and/or Disk Images are your friend, since it appears that FCP-X never gets confused no matter how many of them are on a hard drive and how many you open to re-populate your projects. They just work and simultaneously keep all the directory structure info in precisely the same state it was when the card came out of the camera.”
So once again, we need to change the way that we do things because Apple has decided “theirs” is a better way. There’s a reoccurring theme here. Funny how we didn’t need to do that with ANY other program.
BTW, if I read that thread correctly, Steve Martin has confirmed that making disc images under Lion doesn’t work like it did under SL. In fact, I believe he said it doesn’t work. The Command File-New-Blank Disk Image has indeed been removed in Lion. Are you making Disk Images? If so are you using Lion? If so, I’d like to know how you you are doing it?
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
Mitch Ives
December 22, 2011 at 4:32 pm in reply to: Events and Projects Librarys Missing in FCPX (but folders and videos in finder exist)[Eugeny Korkhin] “FCPX may treat your hard drive as a card from a camera if you have “camera related” folders (i.e. DCIM) on your drive. Check this thread for more info:
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3279953?start=0&tstart=0“Thanks for the link… this is important info. So basically you can never have any files with the words “movie”, “video” or “Final” in them? All I can say is how did this get by the final testers?
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
Mitch Ives
December 19, 2011 at 5:40 pm in reply to: New blog post from Philip Hodgetts. Worth the read.[Oliver Peters] “True, but there’s nothing inherently wrong with a company defending its product designs or points-of-view. And “antenna-gate” really isn’t a great example (though it provides great fodder for levity), because Apple got plenty of push-back. They offered a remedy and subsequently altered the design.”
I believe the point being made was that the design was altered in the next version the 4s. Those with the iPhone4 were told that the problem was imaginary and here’s your phone condom to make everything all right. That was a P.R. disaster and worthy spin of some pathetic political party, not Apple.
As I said in another post, we should expect more of this. This is the Tim Cook way… bring everything to market faster. At some point you start out driving your headlights and you begin to have a string of less than stellar releases… like the iPhone 4… FCPX, OSX Lion, and iCloud. Forget any perceived shortcomings, they all had major defects that made it past testing and into the public release. In the past, that wouldn’t have happened with Apple. As Dylan said, “the times they are a changing”.
Too be fair to Apple, this isn’t unique to them. Mercedes went from #1 in quality to a severe drop, until they publicly admitted it, and then increased the product testing cycle back to what it was before they release a product to the public. Maybe Apple will make the same decision at some point?
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Phil Hoppes] “Why? Because your competition can and will do it good, cheap and fast, and they will figure out how to make a buck at it in the mean time too. You say something like this in manufacturing even 15 years ago and you will get laughed right out of the building as your prospective customer would be more than willing to show you a very large list of competitors that are doing just that. Services are no different. I learned long ago that winners are the ones that ask Why Not? instead of just Why?”
What your describing here is “good enough” not good. When fast and cheap come into play, good is always the variable that gets adjusted. This will never change. Cheaper Chinese nails work, just not as well, and they rust easier. Cast iron pitman arms work, just not as well as forged ones in tough off-road situations. If you don’t care about those things then “good enough” is the same as good, which I believe is really the point..
What will (and has) changed is our view of what is “good enough”. In that regard I agree… the competition that thrives is the one that makes it to “good enough”, doing it quickly and cheaply. The democratization of video has made “good enough” socially acceptable, and I have no problem with that. For decades a lot of us have discussed this point… the most common example being “let’s face it… how much quality do you need when shooting and editing an internal sales meeting”? The truth, not much… it’s 100% content that counts there. Virtually any image quality will work.
Which brings us back to Apple. They are clearly focused on “good enough” or as someone else put it: “good enough for 80% of the market”. I’d agree, and there is nothing wrong with that, and they don’t need our permission to do it that way. Does this mean that I don’t long for the Apple of old. In a word, no. The iPhone 4 antenna shortcomings were a disappointment and more worthy of MS. Lion is the worst OS release since the Lisa 7/7 software… scores of problems that should have been caught before release. FCPX is half-baked… like the obvious titler bug that anyone would have caught, yet it took 5 months to get it fixed. iCloud is providing more problems than solutions and doesn’t even have the two best features of MobileMe.
Will all of this get fixed? I would like to think so… but I’d prefer not to be an involuntary beta tester on all this stuff. I’d prefer to have a choice of a properly functioning option to use while I assist in developing the rough future replacement into something worthy of public release.
This I believe is the “Tim Cook” legacy. That’s his thing… getting everything to market quicker. The problem is (as Mercedes can attest) is that this results in unfinished product coming to market with embarrassing mistakes in it. Mercedes only switched back after sales dropped. Apple’s sales haven’t dropped… at least not yet…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Bill Davis] “Well, It’s a nice feature in an environment where one person works on one computer doing one project.
Okay, I’m confused. This is the group you keep saying is the whole focus of FCPX. You keep saying that it’s a slim minority that needs all the things that are being discussed on the other forum. So, I give up, which one are you championing?
[Bill Davis] I don’t think I’d like it in a world where the sound guy could “RED X” something – and that would eliminate that clip from the libraries of everyone who might be interested in using that footage for something else. (I’m not saying this conforms to any future for FCP-X – cuz I haven’t a clue – but we’ve been led to believe that this foundational re-build is designed to allow future development of professional features – and building in a “kill this footage globally” command at the single user level might turn out to be something that they’d rather look at as something that has wider ramifications.)”
As much as I’m sure this is going to disappoint you, I happen to agree with your analysis. However, one sort of assumed that you might be able to decide whether or not to use it, kind of like compound clips?
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Ray Wang] “In iMovie you could mark part of the clip as rejected and there is a function to strip (“Move Rejected to Trash” if I remember correctly) the rejected contents to save disk space.
This could be part of the clip or the entire clip.
I was going mad trying to find that function in FCP X!”
Nice feature. We had that in an NLE called Incite back in 2000. That’s a feature people would be happy to say they got from iMovie…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “Is the beta public?”
Since it appears on their home page, I don’t think the beta is a secret…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Matthew Celia] “Just looking to justify the purchase since (for me) the synchronize clips feature in FCPX has worked.”
If I read their email correctly this morning:
This will be a free update for all current customers of PluralEyes for Final Cut Pro.
So no cost involved…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill
-
[Jeremy Garchow] “This made me laugh. Thank you. There’s a lot of speculation out there, and a lot of fear, and FUD and rightfully so. When I see something that doesn’t add up, I post. Apple simply saying that displayport is going to be good enough doesn’t add up and I’ll tell you my opinion why. Sorry if it comes across as gruff, but I like to connect the dots. There’s enough to be uncertain about, right?
Not at all… I like honest debate. Nobody has all the answers.
[Jeremy Garchow] We don’t have a choice to wait? I’m waiting. I’ve been waiting for something new for a long time. I am still using FCS3 every day.
You are right, nobody knows, but there’s certain things that can be inferred. Displayport as a video distribution device is not one of them in a professional video application.”
Same here… using FCS3 a lot. Like a lot in FCPX, just wish it was farther along in development…
Mitch Ives
Insight Productions Corp.
mitch@insightproductions.com
http://www.insightproductions.com“Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.” – Winston Churchill