Jeff is correct that ScriptSync is a very different value proposition than speech to text in Premiere Pro. As he notes, takes in ScriptSync are associated to the script, so in one view you have all associated coverage and have the ability to play selected ranges and takes as needed. Spans of dialog can be color coded for preference, etc. You can edit directly from the script based on span/line selected. Also, once in the timeline, you can link back to that take directly with “option-Find script” to see span and line highlighted so you can instantly see what other coverage exists.
The Nexidia engine, as amazing at it is, is only a subset of the reason ScriptSync is used. It eliminates the tedious process of syncing dailies to the script.
In Premiere Pro, a straight up speech to text will have very mixed results and will perform better if it has a script or transcript before the process (isn’t that what the feature is supposed to do in the first place???). From there, every take will have the script associated within the take. That is a very different value proposition when editing. While it is great for navigating within the clip, it misses the greater value of finding the best take for any given dialog. Will work for doc transcripts better because of this, but still is an issue of loading up that clip to see the text.
When I edit, I load up all my takes in ScriptSync, flip my monitor to be portrait, close all my bins, and have access to all my dailies as it relates to the script. Easy for my, the director and producer to understand at a glance, what is available to tell the story.
Michael
Michael Phillips