Forum Replies Created

Page 184 of 428
  • Michael Phillips

    November 19, 2013 at 9:37 pm in reply to: ALE Syntax Error

    Your global headings have no value so timecode checks cannot be done since it does not know what timebase to use:

    Heading
    FIELD_DELIM TABS
    AUDIO_FORMAT FILLIN
    TAPE FILLIN
    FPS FILLIN
    VIDEO_FORMAT FILLIN
    FILM_FORMAT FILLIN

    Should be for 108p/23.976 non film project

    Heading
    FIELD_DELIM TABS
    FPS 23.976
    VIDEO_FORMAT 1080

    The other fields can be missing. Just a heads up that unless these timecode and some source value match EXACTLY you will not be able to relink or merge into any of the dailies. This has been a loooong time request for Media Composer. IF the sources come from the same source as in the good old tape days, then you could declare that value in the global as in:

    Heading
    FIELD_DELIM TABS
    TAPE 001
    FPS 23.976
    VIDEO_FORMAT 1080

    But looking at the ALE there are no sources declared, and assuming a file based camera, every event will be its own source.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    November 19, 2013 at 9:31 pm in reply to: Slip 1 perf question

    From my blog:

    https://24p.com/wordpress/?p=16

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    November 19, 2013 at 2:00 pm in reply to: A new / different camera

    In theory it shouldn’t. The AMA plug-in is developed by Canon, so it should support whatever firmware out in the field. But again, never say never, and a quick test should be able to solve that. Since you are hiring/renting these, can whomever owns them provide you with a quick couple shots and BPAV folder to verify beforehand?

    Michael

  • Sorry, meant get sequence, and not send to. 🙂
    Just do a command-O from EDL Manager and navigate to bin with sequence. Once selected you will be able to choose whichever sequence from the bin (if more than one). If only one it will auto-select that one.

    Michael

  • I would suggest opening the bin directly from EDL Manager rather than the “send to” which uses AAF. Generating AAF process seems to be the issue in this scenario. I have seen the changing tracks taking a long time – it’s a known bug. Still in v7 as well.

    Michael

  • Just zip that one up for archive, and work on the project itself as yours? If you actually want to have a project with your name in it, then it’s a NEW project into which you can copy all the bins from the other project.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    November 18, 2013 at 8:15 pm in reply to: extract and splice in without using mouse

    OS X: Cmmand-X then Command-V
    PC – Control instead of Command

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    November 18, 2013 at 5:56 pm in reply to: The death of QuickTime as we know it

    [[[Jermey Garchow
    Correct. And Avid wanted this certification/ratification. What other company is going to go through, what I am sure, is a long testing process? Apple?

    Will VC-3 be relevant in 10 years? 30 years? 50?]]]

    It does not matter whether the codec is currently relevant 20-50 years down the road. What is relevant is whether the content owner can go back to the orignal sources if and when needed. Ratification is a lengthy process, but that what companies who serve the industry are requested to do by their customers in those markets.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    November 18, 2013 at 5:33 pm in reply to: The death of QuickTime as we know it

    There’s a difference between open source and documentation of a codec available to all. I am fine with a manufacturer making codecs for whatever benefits it can provide as well as keep up with changes in new cameras and deliverables. For example, DNxHD is an Avid developed codec, but the code can be downloaded, or available as VC-3 from SMPTE. The optimized (speed) and name “DNxHD” is what is licensed. But speed aside, assets stored in DNxHD can always be decoded by someone, somewhere per the defined spec. That gives broadcasters and such a little more relief as to accessing their content whether Avid is around or not.

    As far as what archives have value or not. That is the $64K question. You never know when it might have value. The classic example is Monica Lewinski wearing the blue dress. trust me, all those broadcasters were going through their archives for that one.

    Michael

  • Michael Phillips

    November 17, 2013 at 11:25 pm in reply to: The death of QuickTime as we know it

    How you archive is a moving target – but one less worry is not having your camera originals tied up in a proprietary format that may or may not exist in a decade’s time. If it were an openly documented wrapper and codec, one can always get those images back. That’s the whole point of SMPTE despite the time it takes to make anything a standard.

    Michael

Page 184 of 428

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy