Forum Replies Created

Page 30 of 212
  • Mark Maness

    January 27, 2010 at 3:19 pm in reply to: FCP on PC??

    Isn’t that kinda like asking for a Lamborghini with an automatic transmission? Why?

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 27, 2010 at 3:15 pm in reply to: FLV Export Component

    We need more info.

    Do you have Adobe Flash? What version of FCP are you using? What version of Quicktime do you have?

    Quicktime does not come with any FLV Export plugin. You must have purchased a Flash type program that exports thru Quicktime to get that support, such as On2 Flash Exporter or Adobe Flash.

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 24, 2010 at 11:04 pm in reply to: New FCP suite and New Quad16G Ram rendering slow

    Yes, please share!

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 18, 2010 at 8:06 pm in reply to: FCP 7 and ProRes 422

    [Shane Ross] “Better than DVCPRO HD? Well, it’s 10-bit vs DVCPRO HD’s 8-bit. It is full raster 1920×1080, vs DVCPRO HDs 1280×1080. It has a higher data rate, that is why it takes longer to render. So if you don’t mind the loss of resolution and color depth, then use DVCPRO HD.”

    All very true… but when your program comes to air, can you really see the difference? The timelines I have been fighting with are for ESPN. They air HD in 720p, so I have to cross-convert to 720p on output. The reasoning…. our cameras only shoot 1080, not 720. But the Kona 3 gives me that option.

    I’ve rendered lots of graphics thru DVCProHD and I honestly cannot see a visible difference in the quality of the programs. Besides all of this… a lot of networks are airing DVCProHD as one of their main formats.

    [Shane Ross] “Yes. Which is why I do a lot of rendering overnight. Save doing it until I have to. Then I set a big batch encode. If I can’t, well, I have two edit systems… “

    Another good one… But most of the time, I have stuff that has to go out the door today, so I don’t have the luxury of overnight renderings most of the time. Besides… what happens when FCP has crashed in the middle of the night and you get into to your work and find out that you didn’t get anything rendered? That has bitten me before.

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 18, 2010 at 6:59 pm in reply to: FCP 7 and ProRes 422

    Thanks, Shane…

    Its a real shame that marketing is allowed to make ANY claims they want to sell a product, even if they are not true. They shouldn’t be allowed to do that… but they do it anyway.

    As a comparison… I have a 10 sec show slate that was made in Motion. Rending in ProRes422, it takes about 20 minutes. Rendering the exact same slate with the same information inside using DVCProHD takes only about three minutes.

    Can anyone tell me why ProRes 422 is better if it takes about four times longer to render? Isn’t time expensive?

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 18, 2010 at 4:36 pm in reply to: New FCP suite and New Quad16G Ram rendering slow

    No… You’re not crazy at all.

    I, too, am having issues with rendering ProRes 422. But I do know for a fact that ProRes422HQ and PAL do not work well at all. There has always been issues with FCP and PAL for many years now.

    I am also frustrated with this slow rendering… It’s costing me and my company money on wasted time rendering.

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 16, 2010 at 2:53 am in reply to: FCP Crashes with AJA Video Ouput Plug-In error

    Sorry to hear about your problem you are facing but there is a little lesson here. Drives are cheap and easy to install. You need to clone your system drive before making ANY updates, no matter how insignificant they may seem. If a problem does arise, just boot to the clone drive and clone back to your main system drive.

    On another note, I’m still using Leopard and I’m having issues with this too but not near as much as you.

    My new issue is my timelines becoming fully unrendered when I start my Mac in the morning or changing projects. This has happened every single time in the past week, even after performing the usual maintaInance.

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 13, 2010 at 2:42 pm in reply to: FCP Crashes with AJA Video Ouput Plug-In error

    Looks like a pattern is emerging here…

    Mine is much much better after a complete reinstall and cleanup but I still see it on occasions.

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    January 12, 2010 at 4:10 pm in reply to: Anybody able to upconvert to DVCPro HD with Kona 3?

    I know this sounds elementary, but have you uninstalled the AJA drivers, reset your permissions, deleted your prefs and reinstalled. I ask because I saw a similar issue with XDCAM and this procedure solved my issues.

    Make sure that you fully uninstall the AJA software.

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

  • Mark Maness

    December 21, 2009 at 7:35 pm in reply to: Future of FCP/Studio/SMOKE … 2010

    Well…. This is just pure speculation and more than likely will never happen…

    But maybe, Apple is looking for someone to take over the Pro Apps market from them. As any corporation will do, look for alternatives to your divisions rather than letting me suffer. I’m sure that Apple isn’t hurting for capital but they still need to look at the future. The same with Autodesk.

    Just my two cents….

    _______________________________

    Wayne Carey
    Schazam Productions
    https://web.mac.com/schazamproductions
    schazamproductions@mac.com

Page 30 of 212

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy