Juan Salvo
Forum Replies Created
-
Just so you’re aware the values do not concatenate. Each node is a unique transform. The operations are not concatenated. The order matters only in that certain operations have a result that affects the input of the following operation. And some operations do not.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Gtx680ftw is 4gb.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
In order to take advantage of 2 processing gpus you need the full license.
The 590 and 690 are both dual chip cards and show up as two seperate gpus to the OS and to resolve. So in order the take advantage you need a seperate GUI card and full resolve.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
The AAF from resolve can’t have audio unless it was brought in with it. You can export an ale and then bring that into media composer and make your AAF from there.
Another choice is to copy your rendered clips into a unique directory in you Avid Media_Files folder… and let it scan, then drag the mdb file into a fresh bin. And you have a bin with all your audio/video media. Then make an aaf as desired.
Yet another way is to render out your video and then manually sync the audio in media composer and then generate your AAF there.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
You want to export not a timeline, but an ale. You also want to make sure to check to render audio.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
No, the math is not the same. The first node is still performing a gamma lift. That sets the midpoint to the image. The next node in the pulling down the gamma lifted image. This changes. Each node is getting its input from the output of the last. So any manipulations in the node are burned into the image in the next. Including a gamma change. If you make no modifications in the first node and then perform any functions in the second node, it will behave the same as if it was in the first. Because there is no transformation on the image in the first node.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
It’s not very clear, but what is your source? The first node is making adjustment on whatever your source input is… the second is making adjustment on the 32bit float output of your first node.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Or you could just not use a lut on it.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Because of the way Resolve works with a GPU in the case of a dual chip card like the 590/690, you’d be missing out on half the processing power of the card going with a single card. With single chip card like the 580… it’s a smallish difference.. maybe 10-15% less performance. This was drastically improved in resolve 9.
BTW, the 690 is a much better choice than the 590. IMO.
A 690 with a supporting GUI card of a full license version of resolve, can give quite impressive performance… I’ll be doing a write up about it soon.
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author
-
Could be the proxies messed up the FPS… NDF vs DF. or perhaps the sequence fps didn’t match the source fps and you’re seeing the mixed frame rate conform issue. Not sure there’s an advantage to going back to source MXF on Canon stuff, if it’s just rewrapped XDCAM anyway… IMO probably better off converting to DNxHD or ProRes to begin with. Not to mention what’s the point when you’re dealing with C300 footage. 😉
Colorist | Online Editor | Post Super | VFX Artist | BD Author