Forum Replies Created

Page 58 of 132
  • Job Ter burg

    September 23, 2011 at 4:30 pm in reply to: Master Clips into Sub Clips?

    What type of subclips do you need? You can export an ALE from the bin, optionally modify the ALE (into V-only, for example), then import the ALE, and choose “merge with known sources and create subclips”.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 19, 2011 at 8:51 pm in reply to: Avid won’t recognize Unity Drives

    Type “alldrives” into the Console (CMD-6).

  • Job Ter burg

    September 17, 2011 at 6:36 am in reply to: Where to buy Avid Media Composer Academic in UK?

    All version ship with both Mac and PC installers on the same disk, so that won’t matter. AFAIK, the only way to buy educational is from a brick & morter reseller, where one will have to prove that one is eligible for an Academic license. Quite often, film schools or training institutes will have a shop that can sell you Academic licenses, but in theory, any reseller should be able to.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 13, 2011 at 6:21 pm in reply to: FCP to Media Composer switch? Downsides?

    They are not just rumors, but no one can say which devices will be supported and when. Those who know, can’t publicly speak about it.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 13, 2011 at 7:18 am in reply to: FCP to Media Composer switch? Downsides?

    “there must be a reason FCP built up a following”
    You mean other than price? I’d love to finally hear one such reason.

    OK, to be a bit more honest, Avid’s effects handling, while sufficient for most, is not as flexible as FCP’s.
    FCP is resolution independent up to almost 4K, IRRC. With Avid, you get PAL, NTSC, 720p, 1080i and 1080p. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing in between.

    Avid doesn’t do XML. It does AAF, though.

    And the great thing about Avid is: 30 day free trial version, fully functional.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 13, 2011 at 7:17 am in reply to: FCP to Media Composer switch? Downsides?

    “there must be a reason FCP built up a following”
    You mean other than price? I’d love to finally hear one such reason. Really, I have found FCP to be extremely overhyped throughout its entire existence.

    But OK, here’s some thoughts:

    Avid’s effects handling, while sufficient for most, is not as flexible as FCP’s.

    FCP is resolution independent up to almost 4K, IRRC. With Avid, you get PAL, NTSC, 720p, 1080i and 1080p. Nothing more, nothing less, nothing in between.

    Avid doesn’t do XML. It does AAF, though.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 12, 2011 at 12:52 pm in reply to: Headings Don’t Travel?

    Make sure you’re not in “Brief” mode.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 12, 2011 at 11:29 am in reply to: New AJA device

    Yeah, that box looked like a very interesting tool. Thunderbolt-based. Lots of I/O, more specifically: multichannel audio outputs.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 7, 2011 at 9:06 am in reply to: Goodbye FCP, Hello Avid

    Welcome! Also, forthcoming releases should show a lot of progress in the look of the interface.

  • Job Ter burg

    September 4, 2011 at 11:00 am in reply to: Exporting ProRes Cocec possible from Avid MC?

    Do same-as-source. Supply him with the Avid QT codec. Have him render to ProRes. DNxHD, unlike ProRes, is cross-platform, and free. You don’t need to defend your machine.

Page 58 of 132

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy