I think something like a Flame comes into play when your main work is high-end compositing/VFX and you have a client sat with you constantly on a very tight deadline. (ie: Music video, high-end TVCs, etc.)
AE (plus rest of Adobe s/ware, Combustion, FCP, etc) is great for more mograph work or jobs with less time constraints, because you can have several seats working on a job at a time for the fraction of the cost of a single Flame suite.
We do mainly low-mid budget TVCs and my PC-based s/ware collection set up works just dandy. If we were to start chasing high-end FX stuff and heavy compositing I’d push for a Flame. I know a Post Production house down the road with a Flame that just sits there barely getting used most of the time, because the type of work they generally do doesn’t call for it, or clients don’t want to pay the premium.
We’ll be getting a Smoke or Nitris DS to replace our Quantel Editbox fairly soon I imagine, because our work calls for the speed and flexibilty they provide. But for GFX, software based variety is the best fit.
Horses for courses as always…
*Production Studio Premium / *Combustion 3
————————————-
Win XP Pro SP2 / Intel P4 3GHz / 2GB RAM / GeForce FX5200 / DeckLink Pro / Sony BVM-20G1E / DVS SDI Clipstation / 110GB boot/80GB media/600GB RAID-0