Forum Replies Created

Page 23 of 28
  • Jan Janowski

    February 14, 2008 at 3:11 am in reply to: Quicktime 7.4.1 export issues

    For the time being… STAY AWAY from Quicktime 7.4.x
    I hear that 7.3.1 is be best/Safest version to use.

    Bugs in DRM is what I hear…

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 30, 2008 at 4:29 pm in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    Based upon info from the above post, I ran that benchmark, and here are results:
    Display
    Random Pixel 1166
    Lines 2201333
    circles 458442
    rectangles 461362
    texts 3684951
    flood fills 216785440
    draw 142164

    Processor
    MDIPS 12864
    MWIPS 8841
    Speed 2667

    Memory
    Integer 147570
    Real 165862
    Int Split 151520
    Real Split 185461

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 29, 2008 at 6:57 pm in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    The dealer wants to know if a red render bar appears above the stills on the timeline, but still seems to preview in realtime without rendering.

    YES!!! As I mentioned before, All Tests were done without rendering, in a NTSC SD session, 48K audio

    And, to confirm, you ARE using PPro CS3 with no cards like a Matrox product, right?
    That is correct…. No Capture cards. (I do use a DV Transverter, but it was not powered up at the time)

    And my final question… Is your Premiere Pro CS3 part of the suite (including AE, Photoshop, Illustrator, etc.) or was it installed as the standalone product?
    It was part of a Suite, but that shouldn’t be an issue.

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 29, 2008 at 1:55 pm in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    I can tell you that I never had to make any “Tweaks” to the system, or any system I’ve ever had PPRO loaded on.

    In fact, other than a display driver, to get optimum overlay working, I’ve never had to “Tweak” any system I’ve loaded Adobe products on — it’s always worked ‘out of the box’.

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 29, 2008 at 12:01 am in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    Here’s the link to the motherboard:
    https://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon1333/5000X/X7DA8+.cfm

    And a link to the display card:
    https://www.nvidia.com/object/quadro_fx_product_literature.html

    I stayed with XP Pro 32 bit because I knew it would work.

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 28, 2008 at 11:50 pm in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    OK… Did the test…
    A100 JPEG files are 3872 x 2592, which are much larger than what you were wanting, but should show there is plenty of headroom. Imported 3 into an NTSC SD session and twirled, zoomed and positioned the images. NO PROBLEM playing them back on timeline without rendering them!]
    NO PROBLEM!
    I even went so far as to call up the Preformance Monitor to show all 8 processors. Maximum CPU useage was 5-6% while playing back the timeline without rendering…
    NO hesitation whatsoever.

    By the way: I put all my $$ into CPU and Motherboards, and cheaped out on the video display cause I ran out of money: I’m running the NVIDIA Quadro FX560 with two Refurbished Gateway 1830 Displays at 1280 x 1024. This seems to work fine, even though it isn’t the high horsepower display card the seller wanted me to buy.. But it still works fine…

    I hope this is the results you wanted…..

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 28, 2008 at 9:33 pm in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    I’ll bring some JPEG’s in from my A100 camera, it is much bigger than 1000.

    I’ll print out your question, so I don’t miss anything… I’ll try to do it tonight…

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 28, 2008 at 8:00 pm in reply to: Premiere CS3 and dual quad-core mobo performance

    A couple months ago I finally purchased a new computer.
    Supermicro Motherboard & Case with SCSI & SATA Raid controllers onboard, 2 Quad Xeons @ 2.66G, 4 GB Ram (3Gb Switch), XP Pro 32 bit.
    I’m very happy with it. CS3 works very nicely with it.
    Prior to this I ran CS3 on a P4 2.8G W/HT, 2GB ram,
    Prior to that Ran PPRO V2 on a P4 2.2G with 1GB ram.

    Each computer worked, but you could tell an noticable improvement with the hardware improvements!!

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    January 13, 2008 at 11:11 pm in reply to: Still having motion blur problem….PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!

    Sounds like he’s got his fields out of sequence…
    F2F1 instead of F1F2

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

  • Jan Janowski

    December 26, 2007 at 1:50 pm in reply to: Auto Contrast — goes nuts on fade to black

    It acts more like a Trap!

    It’s my contention, that an effect should look identical before and after a render.

    In this case, the Silhouettes and fades do not show a push to white until After the render. This is a big trap waiting to spring on an un-suspecting user.

    In my case, a 70 minute program was transferred with slightly low video, due to no scopes in capture (another sore point with me that I’ve commented about for a long, long time!).

    If you release an effect that will make black — white after a render — at least have the effect do this when dropped on the clip, instead of improving the overall video, but neglecting to show you the areas that will be rendered un-useable after rendering!!!

    Looking for 1939 Indian Motocycle

Page 23 of 28

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy