[Bill Davis] “I’ve spent as much time over the past four months, for example, considering taxonomy (the field of intelligent naming and labeling) and export modes (versioning and persistent connection verses “save as” and “orphan document” creation.) as I have concentrating on the traditional skills of scene pacing or titling. My use of X on a near daily basis has literally changed much of my thinking about what it means to be an “editor” in the modern sense. “
It’s nice to see you’ve gotten religion over the importance of naming and labeling Bill, but this stuff has been at the center of proper editing workflows since before there was such a term. When it was all film clips in bins the naming and labeling was kept in a notebook, but it was still the only way to deal with the retrieval and identification of 100,000 feat of film. From hand written notebooks to flat file databases to the kind of work you can do today with CatDV and FCPX, the essential nature of preliminary organization in any editorial process cannot be overstated.
It’s nice that your experience with X has impressed this on you, but since you can’t export any of this information outside of X, it seems, to an outsider like me, rather limited compared to something like CatDV where you can create a browsing library linking your metadata and files for all the world to see and use.
But that’s just a Ludite’s point of view.
Herb Sevush
Zebra Productions
—————————
nothin’ attached to nothin’
“Deciding the spine is the process of editing” F. Bieberkopf