Forum Replies Created
-
[Brian Cooney] “so DNX will behave and render as quickly as prores? that’s good. IS DNX something Adobe plans to develop further and maintain s part of their production suite? Do they see it as necessary or only a response to prores? Just wondering. I had heard there were some rendering features and times Premiere had that were better than FCP .
“DNX is not ADOBE, it’s Avid’s, and though supported in premiere, it is not optimized for it as it is for avid products. Just like ProRes in premiere. In my opinion the lack of a proper mastering/proxy/unifying codec in premiere is one of it’s strongest weaknesses. Was sure Adobe would be smart enough to acquire Cineform… Now they have to buy GoPro too 🙂
Avid will maintain and further develop DNX (hopefully) as it is still invaluable to many Avid workflows
As for DNX
[John Pale] ” you can give Avid DNX a try. Its a free download from Avid and is comparable in every way to ProRes.”
DNX is good and solid, but it is not ProRes, not yet at least. For one, it does not have SD or greater than HD options, in fact, it is strictly HD 720 or 1080. Furthermore, it still does not have a 444 variant, and always clips to 709. And last, ProRes 4×4 is 12 bit color depth, DNX does not top 10 to my best knowledge.
All that said, I use Media Encoder all the time, it’s amazing for encoding flash, it works fast, converts hours of weird .MTS files to good looking ProRes in no time and it’s simple to use.
Recently I had 3D animations in different sizes and resolutions I had to unify to 1080. I tried compressor ( with every possible setting) and Episode, but Media Encoder blew them all.
Hector
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
[Steve Connor] “Do all those items have any impact on how fast FCPX opens ?”
actually yes
i noticed later that the project opened slower than other small projects i’ve been playing with.
much slower
so slow i was worried it froze.
but once it opened it works with no lagging at all, even loading thumbnails is fast.
i must say though, that the station i tested is old, and the graphic card is a bare minimum ATI 1900
add to that the rather slow WD ext drive (even as a RAID0 on eSATA)i’ll measure times tomorrow, and i’ll try the same test on a better faster system..
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
Nice one Brendan
Thanks
The lack of a gamma filter drove me to build one in motion too. Yours is much cooler 🙂
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
we used it in our studio on an Internet tapeless project
the keyer is superb and very real-timewe are still learning it, from manual and forums
we’re about to start offering a fast courses on FCPX
so spending a lot of time with itwhich is not helping me like it more
but i’m starting to accept it. somewhat…
hector
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
Hector Berrebi
June 25, 2011 at 10:27 pm in reply to: Why most of the the “Trainers” are so positive about X-FCP[Shawn Lloyd] “it seems very disingenuous, and a bit insulting to the collective intelligence of the professional community. Sadly, I feel like both Apple and the evangelist / trainers are all loosing a lot of credibility.”
Shawn
trainers train people, that’s what they do. you would be surprized how many people actually want to learn FCPX
[Shawn Lloyd] “Do they not realize that 90% of their piers feel exactly the opposite?”
90%… how did you come up with these stats, you haven’t checked this… you are just writing it out of passion and disappointment.
whether i feel the product is complete, adequate or currently usable in a professional environment does not mean i will stop what i do for a living (partly) and refuse to properly learn it, and offer the best training i can to others who want to as well.
and i will not teach anything that is not true about it…
your comment, and this thread… and some other recent threads in this room
have a mob/posse attitude[Andree Franks] “Oh one thing I don#t like about some leaders and users here is the arrogance and how rude they are! :p
got to go…”as long as you are just saying it without valid examples and links… your comment is rude and even a little stupid.
peace and love
hector
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
[David Roth Weiss] “Why don’t the two of you just get a room… :)”
ha ha…
though seriously… fcpx lovers out there… why can’t you accept that the forum is a free open discussion space and some of the discussions are somewhat negative
we can all write in the same forum, whether we like or dislike it
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
Hector Berrebi
June 22, 2011 at 8:15 pm in reply to: What Apple needs to do to make FCPX useful? (Post Pro, not Home User)[Russell Lasson] “. Make projects actual projects instead of sequences. A project should contain events, folders, multiple sequences. When you close a project, all the events, folders, and sequences should close. Media management should be based on a project base, not globally.”
Russ,
this thread is a good and (might be) useful initiativehowever, we have to be logical, and its a game that plays both ways. i can imagine apple fixing many things in next updates/versions of X but they won’t change the concept, and we will have to either learn to adapt or find new tools.
i like project based too, and after 15 years of editing and 8 of training i feel a bit lost in a timeline based project with global media, but i can definitely see my workflows change and adapt to it, knowing it makes little sense that apple will back up from it.
i won’t adapt to not sending out OMF, not working with XML and not having access to older project files
i would add to the list a more customizable interface
and i still hope i’m wrong about it, and i’ve made improvements since yesterday, but it feels that the new trim tools suffer from over simplicity.
i still didn’t figure out complex trimming on this thing (audio left, video right for example)a “send to color” feature would be nice… at least as long its still around…
they had a “send to shake” option when shake was on its death bed…i’ll have more when i’m done with the manual
this is a good thread
hector
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
-
Hector Berrebi
June 22, 2011 at 1:15 pm in reply to: How to integrate the FCPX Auto-Matching function into traditional workflow – Workaround[Clayton Burkhart] “Obviously, this is only convenient with complex grades or where this is a ton of matching shots which need to be graded.”
🙂 i wonder what project would be that hard to match traditionally that you would need this sort of workaround for it…
i agree with Jeremy
not that practical yet.
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting -
[Sascha Engel] “A sad day for all professional FCP users!”
🙂 you’re quick
but remember what i told you on that same talk
if it is apple’s VISTA, and they will acknowledge it, like Microsoft did at the time. then by next NAB we will see solutions to many things that bug us in this release. and peace will reign again
the scary scenario is that they don’t care, or worst… believe there is nothing wrong with this version
we must feedback, and feedback a lot
maybe some online petition page?
this would be the perfect timing for ithector
Hector Berrebi
prePost Consulting
