Harm Millaard
Forum Replies Created
-
Do you have a good stock of headache pills? If not, you will have major headaches editing YouTube material, you could just as well import black stills.
-
The Z1 is 1440×1080 with PAR 1.33, so what did you do to get 1280×720 square pixel? It seems like you went astray.
-
Impossible. The DVD specs say 720×480. No way around that.
-
DV is 720×480, I don’t know what the iPod is, but significantly less, possibly 360×240, and then you want to enlarge that to 1920×1080?
I hope you have a sufficient supply of headache pills, because it will be disastrous.
-
[hhv_pro] “I’ve had yet to see an affordable (unless you are talking about dual Fiber Optic types) Raid config that can deliver uncompressed full HD in other then Raid0.”
Maybe you didn’t look in the right place. Uncompressed full HD is only 1.485 Gb/s, any decent 8 or 10 disk Raid5/6 array can easily handle that and the total cost is no more than $ 1.800 for a ten disk array with 5 TB of storage with a top-of-the-bill raid controller.
-
Just a very personal opinion: Get rid of the Matrox card. It is great as a door stopper.
-
If you mean an internal 320 SATA disk, yes. SATA is about twice as fast as a fire wire disk and about three times as fast as a USB disk.
-
Quote from Tom’s Hardware:
AMD’s Athlon 64 X2 processors 5600+ and 6000+ did well in the synthetic benchmarks and in 3DMark. They also deliver good performance to compress files with WinRAR, process pictures in Adobe Photoshop CS2 or create large PDF documents with Acrobat 7, thanks to their integrated memory controller. They don’t have a chance against the Core 2 Duo, however, if you are looking to encode or transcode digital audio or video. If you are willing to spend more than $200 on the processor, Core 2 Duo still is the only reasonable choice.
Where ever you got the notion that a dual core 4600 is equivalent to 9.2 GHz is beyond me.
The last sentence in the quote makes sense to me: Core 2 Duo still is the only reasonable choice.
-
That is indicative of the kind of projects you do and was the reason I asked the OP to give more info. Did you ever try a HDV project with 6+ video tracks or even a DV project with 12+ tracks? You may think differently, once you tried that.
The whole point is now mute since the OP has never answered and there is no longer any reason to try to assist him in asnyway.
-
[hhv_pro] “On storage you will be better off with 4-8 drives Raid0 based array.”
I have to disagree on this. Why would you opt for a 4-8 fold chance of losing all your data, just by having ONE disk fail? Better to use Raid5 or Raid6, since the performance loss is negligent and due to the redundancy (which lacks completely in (R)aid0) you can have one or even two disks fail at the same time without losing any data.