[Simon Ubsdell] “It has also, to my mind, all but killed what was worthwhile in this forum, which at its best has hosted some outstandingly good discussions – conversations that grew out of a shared appreciation of the endlessly fascinating plurality of the world, conversations that are strangled at birth by the tyranny of a single dominant ideology.”
Those that continue to be obsessed with spouting endlessly about the greatness of one NLE over another are losing sight of the forest for the trees. Editing is all about the craft of storytelling and so whatever device allows one to tell a great story is the right device.
I also agree that speed is not the end goal. Putting video pieces together takes time. Not because the equipment used is slow but rather because you need to look through the material over and over and over to get a feel for what it is you want to build. Then you have to revise and revise and revise to make it good. This takes time and it’s ok. I don’t judge my success on how many pieces I edit in a year. I want the pieces I do cut to be as compelling to a viewer as possible because if they aren’t then I haven’t done my job very well.
Many editors who don’t use FCPX as their main edit tool at least respect that it has a lot of to offer. End of story.
Now back to the real thing that we do as professionals – tell stories. A conversation about how folks approach building story arcs and how they assemble pieces for maximum impact on the viewer is about a thousand times more interesting and relevant to me than which NLE they use to create that story.
Windows 10 Pro | i7-5820k CPU | 64 gigs RAM | NvidiaGeForceGTX970 | Blackmagic Decklink 4k Mini Monitor |
Adobe CC 2018 |Renders/cache: Samsung SSD 950 Pro x2 in Raid 0 | Media: Samsung SSD 960 PRO PCIe NVMe M.2 2280 | Media: OWC Thunderbay 4 x 2 Raid 0 mirrored with FreeFileSync