Graham Quince
295
After Effects Coins
242
COW Coins
2
Maxon C4D Coins
Forum Replies Created
-
It feels quite clever, like something pushing through a rubber sheet, but actually might be really simple, what you’re seeing is a series of gradients. If you take each shot separately rather than imagining a simulation, then gradient ramp gets the look quite easily.
Alternatively, if it was one sequence with different cameras, then you’d need to use full fat C4D* with a cloth and hard body simulation.
* as opposed to C4D Lite which comes free with After Effects CC
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
When you expand the text layer settings on the timeline you’ll see there’s an property for source text. There’s a stopwatch next to it, meaning you can keyframe the text. The key frames can only be hold key frames. The text will jump from one stare to the next.
Hope that makes sense
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
Things that can affect Element in the composition compared to scene up: Lights, Environment, environment influence, ambient occlusion settings, glow settings, layer transfer mode.
Take a look at each of these and see if that helps.
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
I agree with Cassius here. If you’ve been able to get such a good track, it’ll be so much quicker to redo using the included Mocha AE and that provides coordinate data for screen replacements.
Quick tutorial I did covering this: https://blogs.creativecow.net/blog/14977/just-the-tip-free-tracking-images-for-tablets-and-phones-for-easy-screen-replacement
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
You’ve hit a maths problem there. Dividing by 0% will produce infinite as a result.
Easiest way to avoid if to wrap everything in an IF statement:
If (percent > 0) {
// same as before
} else {
// some value that looks right
}http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
I’ve only done this one time myself, but what I did was position my footage as a 3D layer within the set, matched the first camera position, then duplicated the footage layer and replaced it with the second angle. Using the auto-orient transform option, I then created camera 2 and lined that up, knowing both layers were in the same position in 3D space.
This way meant I only rendered one comp. Edited using premiere’s multi cam approach and the using the “replace with AE composition” to get the edits into After Effects. Then precomped together the layers of the same angles and dropped the precomps into three copies of the virtual set using the above workflow. Applied the keying to the precomps etc…
In the original imported comp from premiere, I added the virtual set comps and used the precomps as track mattes to control visibility / match edit.
Not saying my approach is better, just how I did it.
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
Is this close to what you’re after:
Turbulent Displace transition https://youtu.be/juD-MDRv5jM
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blogSome contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.
-
Nope sorry. When you create a 360 video, you’re creating a large, flat projection of a sphere. 3D video websites like YouTube then let you scan around the video, as if it was wrapped around. It’s not the same as a 3D gaming environment or even AE’s own 3D.
But, I do know YouTube have that D.o.G. Option in their channel settings that let you have a channel logo in the bottom right-hand corner. No idea if it works with 360 videos, but that would solve your problem (if you’re using YouTube)
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
I’ve only ever used linear() with time as the first variable, what we’re looking at for you is:
Linear(
Current time,
Starting time,
End time,
Start position (i.e. 780),
End position (i.e. final calculated temperature position)
)
So start time would be 0, end time would be the time the animation takes.
I think. Hope it’s right.
Sounds like a useful project.
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blog -
There’s a few steps needed but it’s all possible.
1) Create an null object and either track or manually keyframe it to follow the guys finger.
2) Then link this Null to CC Particle world using a set of expressions, Ive shared a tutorial on how to do that: Linking CC Particle World to a 3D Null in After Effects
3) In the Physics section of CC Particle World, set the velocity and gravity to 0
4) In the Particle section, use the birth and death sizes they have the particles start small and grow big.
http://www.YouTube.com/ShiveringCactus – Free FX for amateur films
https://shiveringcactus.wordpress.com/ – FX blogSome contents or functionalities here are not available due to your cookie preferences!This happens because the functionality/content marked as “Google Youtube” uses cookies that you choosed to keep disabled. In order to view this content or use this functionality, please enable cookies: click here to open your cookie preferences.