Forum Replies Created

Page 78 of 144
  • Graeme Nattress

    October 7, 2005 at 3:05 pm in reply to: Sony HDV with a 24fps look

    Film Effects at http://www.nattress.com will do the trick for you! THe New 2.5.1 version works great with HDV.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    October 7, 2005 at 3:02 pm in reply to: pal and NTSC

    No, They’re for FCP only.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    October 7, 2005 at 12:56 am in reply to: Downconverting HDV to SD

    It should look like very good 1/3″ CCD video. It won’t look as good as say, digibeta or DVCpro50 shot on a 2/3″ camera, but it should look better than DV shot with a 1/3″ camera, and you’ve got real widescreen to boot.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    October 7, 2005 at 12:54 am in reply to: pal and NTSC

    Don’t see any reason why not, but you’d have to scale up the NTSC video (potentially loosing rez) as well as dealing with the 4% speedup.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    October 6, 2005 at 5:48 pm in reply to: Downconverting HDV to SD

    BetaSP is an ancient analogue format, with only about 75% the resolution of standard def digital video, and hence you can’t really compare it to a digital format – it’s like apples to oranges. All digital tape formats look better than BetaSP, even boring old DV, so it’s not a “gold standard” to compare to.

    Converting to DV rather than uncompressed for mastering a NTSC DVD is a bad idea though. DV is 4:1:1 and DVD is 4:2:0 and they clash. Best to go from HDV to uncompressed 8bit 4:2:2 and avoid DV altogether. So I’d suspect that capturing in FCP as HDV and downconverting in FCP5 (high qwuality scaling turned on) would be best.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    October 6, 2005 at 12:50 pm in reply to: pal and NTSC

    You should be able to speed up 24p to 25p just fine, to make “PAL” HD – I don’t see any reason why not.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Don’t bet on it. I had a “dropout” on a cheaper CF card the other week.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • You probably exported “using Quicktime conversion”, which is to be avoided, as you’re incurring a Y’CbCr to RGB to Y’CbCr conversion, and the stuttering is either a wrong frame rate setting, or your hard drive can’t cope with uncompressed.

    For getting DV to uncompressed, I’d recommend copying your sequence to an uncompressed seq in FCP, or changing the compression settings of your seq to uncompressed, and then export -> quicktime movie, accept defaults.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    September 29, 2005 at 11:58 pm in reply to: Nasty Video Look- how do I eliminate it?!

    Thanks Kevin! I was going to suggest that an Application of Nattress Film Effects will probably do the job – Preset Basic should be perfect!

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

  • Graeme Nattress

    September 29, 2005 at 2:02 pm in reply to: hd100u vs. hvx200

    Certainly the JVC is ergonomically superior, so I’d agree that I’d prefer to use it, but the image through it still looks sub-par to me.

    Graeme

    – http://www.nattress.com – Film Effects and Standards Conversion for FCP

Page 78 of 144

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy