Forum Replies Created

Page 90 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    July 15, 2013 at 3:51 pm in reply to: CC-CS6-X render comparisons

    [Marcus Moore] “Optimized for the machine means it will be in some form optimized for the machine.”

    Exactly how? What will FCPX be optimized for on the Mac Pro that it currently doesn’t support on a high-end iMac? Outside of dual GPU, which I assume would be included as part of the OpenCL framework anyway.

  • Gary Huff

    July 15, 2013 at 12:03 pm in reply to: CC-CS6-X render comparisons

    [Marcus Moore] “o be fair, that’s what Phil Schiller made a special point of saying at WWDC.”

    And Schiller writes a lot of code for FCPX, right?

    I’m astounded that people here take the word of corporate marketing…do you also have indepth tech discussions with the booth babes at NAB?

  • Gary Huff

    July 15, 2013 at 12:47 am in reply to: CC-CS6-X render comparisons

    [Bob Woodhead] “Imagine what the results will be with the MacProTrashcan and an optimized version of FCPX.”

    FCPX won’t be “optimized” for the new Mac Pro and more than you would say the current version is “optimized” for the iMac vs. the Mac Mini.

    FCPX takes advantage of CPU advancements in Sandy/Ivy/Haswell, and GPU acceleration via OpenCL. What more needs to be “optimized” for the Mac Pro?

  • Gary Huff

    July 13, 2013 at 1:20 pm in reply to: Oliver Peter’s Thoughts On The New Mac Pro

    I suspect the people who most want the ability to reframe will simply be zooming in on 4k on a 4k timeline.

    And then render down to 1080 for the master.

    Like what we did with the jump from 480 to 1080.

  • Gary Huff

    July 12, 2013 at 11:48 pm in reply to: Oliver Peter’s Thoughts On The New Mac Pro

    [John Davidson] “[I]t’s no wonder I’m probably getting an ulcer from raw, unfettered impatience.”

    Yes, I too am impatient to start being able to render down 4k footage to 1080p.

  • [Jason Van Patten] “From a pure CPU-brute perspective, the Mac Pro will crush the laptop. But clearly something was at play here that made the export in FCPX literally twice as fast as the big monster. I’m betting it was AVX.”

    That’s something I’ve been very interested in: real-world render times. I mean, how much faster *exactly* is the Xeon 12-core going to be against, say, an iMac, for FCPX/Premiere/After Effects renders? If the new Mac Pro is a significant gain over the old one, or over an iMac, that will be something.

    But if I’m ultimately not going to gain that much (which could be for a variety of reasons), then perhaps the iMac is the way to go.

    I mean, I know on paper the new Mac Pro should be screaming, but I’d like to see some actual numbers for that.

  • Gary Huff

    July 8, 2013 at 3:41 am in reply to: Promise Pegasus reliability issues…

    Thanks for your testimonial, Ken. I need a RAID setup here within the not too distant future, so I’m always curious as to what others are using, and which ones are very happy with their setups.

  • Gary Huff

    July 5, 2013 at 5:43 pm in reply to: Progress!

    [tony west] ” You don’t like it because you want to look down your nose at people using programs that you may not approve of.”

    Where is that idea even coming from? Do you understand the difference between After Effects and a Digital Juice motion graphics template, or are you just trying to be difficult?

    [tony west] “Local news? who said anything abut local news. I was talking about NETWORK news. I have never done local news.”

    You actually never specified exactly, so I merely made an assumption. A poor assumption, but frankly, that was just a snark and not the crux of my dismissal of it.

    [tony west] “Who sends out a 2 man crew to cover local news? You should have known better than that, dude.”

    Not sure where that’s coming from…I guess you easily get confused between conversations with different people? You keep alluding to things that were never said or expressed. I said that poor audio on a standup would be inexcusable, but I don’t see how that equates to “Local news sends out a 2 person crew to cover local stories.”

    [tony west] “And Air force one means the President of the United States. Get the sound right.”

    Sorry, if you’re too lazy to write out “Air Force One” and instead call it “AF one”, I have no idea what you’re talking about, nor will I care. But if you’re going to be that specific about it, then perhaps a link is in order.

    I would suspect that the actual video will be understandable in its poor production values, thus rendering your entire point ridiculously absurd.

  • Gary Huff

    July 5, 2013 at 4:22 pm in reply to: Progress!

    [Bill Davis] “You can disbelieve him. Which on the Internet is fair. But at some point the aggregate of what a person postts here and elsewhere in this era where everything lives on the net persistently -reveals whether they are what they say they are or not.”

    Not at all, but I think we need to be aware of when we created a story out of nothing from editing, and when we simply got out of the way as an editor.

    I’m just trying to understand what the idea of “high end” editing is (outside of having a great DP who delivers astounding footage in the first place).

  • [Dave Gage] “Didn’t you say earlier that you weren’t using the driver?”

    Yes, I don’t know if the slim ExpressCard version requires a driver or not. Some do, some don’t (the other Sonnet SD card reader (the 21-in-1) didn’t require a driver, while the UHS-I reader did. So you might need a driver with the slim-line version of the eSATA card, while the Tempo-Pro doesn’t.

Page 90 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy