Forum Replies Created

Page 89 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    August 8, 2013 at 2:34 pm in reply to: Why FxFactory?

    [Oliver Peters] “Interestingly enough, since the FxF Pro filters use Core Image, many of these filters also work with Pixelmator, if you have that installed.”

    That’s good to know, thanks Oliver!

    I have only used the freebies so far, but I’m trialing some plugins I’ve heard about, and I rather like the FxFactory setup. I think perhaps the “bloat” comes about if you don’t disable trials (you end up with quite a list in your NLE if you don’t), and the interface is a little sluggish in the app itself.

  • Gary Huff

    August 5, 2013 at 1:58 pm in reply to: Is the Compressor UI sluggish or is it just me?

    [Petter Stahre] “The other free ticket to a slow Compressor is to have the Preview-window open. Close it.”

    I tried that and it completely solved the issue. Compressor works like I would expect it to now.

    I really hope they give it a 64-bit makeover along with updating the GUI. It’s in sore need of that.

  • Gary Huff

    August 2, 2013 at 1:39 am in reply to: The difference in dissolves

    [James Cude] “It’s more likely you’re accustomed to the way they look in FCP7.”

    I am accustomed to the way dissolves look in FCP7 and Premiere. FCPX’s dissolve do look different, and not in a good way, unlike the Slide transition which is different, but in a way I think is better.

  • Gary Huff

    August 2, 2013 at 1:38 am in reply to: Is the Compressor UI sluggish or is it just me?

    [Petter Stahre] “The other free ticket to a slow Compressor is to have the Preview-window open. Close it.”

    I will try that, thanks!

  • Gary Huff

    August 2, 2013 at 1:38 am in reply to: Is the Compressor UI sluggish or is it just me?

    [John Pale] “It does that with certain codecs…like the H264 used in GoPro footage, or AVCHD”

    That would be it then because it’s mostly been AVCHD I’ve been working with in FCPX.

  • [Jeremy Garchow] “It is nearly 60 years of footage from various sources from Film to VHS, HD, to SD and below, that is now all ProRes…”

    Yep, that’ll do it!

  • [Jeremy Garchow] “A current 2.5 min project I am working on has over 7TBs of footage. This is for one measly video.”

    Blackmagic CC footage?

  • Gary Huff

    July 25, 2013 at 7:23 pm in reply to: Workflow to Color

    [Ronny Courtens]
    But if Color is not absolutely necessary for you: get Davinci Resolve. It’s free, it’s good and you can open FCPXML straight in Resolve. No workarounds.”

    Absolutely. Color is EOL’d and really old. DaVinci is far more current compatible. Best to move on to that, especially since Lite is very powerful and free.

  • Gary Huff

    July 24, 2013 at 3:45 pm in reply to: And another thing… Conspiracy theories

    [Fiona Fuchs] “Any ideas of how this FCP thing will end up?”

    Apple is, so far, doing the right thing by it. It’s useful, especially for particular projects.

    And you should have room in your brain for knowing how to use both FCPX and Premiere.

  • Gary Huff

    July 15, 2013 at 5:37 pm in reply to: CC-CS6-X render comparisons

    [Marcus Moore] “As I said, dedicated GPU background rendering is one possibility- and it’s a possibility that’s even hinted at in the MacPro blurb.”

    What would prevent FCPX from doing that with the 680MX 2GB GPU in the iMac, albeit slower obviously?

Page 89 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy