Forum Replies Created

Page 170 of 180
  • Gary Huff

    August 5, 2011 at 9:12 pm in reply to: FCP-X – Apple’s most successful launch ever?

    [Jim Giberti]If you’ve got a good point I, for one, would respect it more if your weren’t angry and personal in making it.

    So pointing out a terrible analogy is angry and personal? You are making an incredibly wrong assumption about my post, Jim.

    And where is this “He never said it was a hit” nonsense coming from? His point was quite clear that love/hate are two sides of the same coin, and thus Apple’s launch is a success because here we are talking about FCPX. Just because he doesn’t come outright and say “I think it’s a hit!” doesn’t mean he didn’t say it.

    “Subtlety” does exist, you know. Though while that post attempted, it was still pretty obvious.

    I’ve read a number of Bill’s posts and I don’t recall him ever responding that way.

    Oh, please. Bill can be just as snarky as the rest of us. He just thinks he hides it better.

  • Gary Huff

    August 5, 2011 at 7:05 pm in reply to: FCP-X – Apple’s most successful launch ever?

    You are wrong. He IS saying it was a hit. The whole story was about how love/hate are two sides of the same coin and that because we’re discussing the pros/cons of the software (some of us more passionately than others) that makes it a “hit” because if it wasn’t, we’d be indifferent.

    It’s really just silly, though.

  • Gary Huff

    August 5, 2011 at 6:46 pm in reply to: What Do we Do now? How Do you Feel?

    Andree, please use this:

    https://forums.creativecow.net/cowtestpostforum

    to test your forum posts first.

    Thanks.

  • Gary Huff

    August 5, 2011 at 6:00 pm in reply to: FCP-X – Apple’s most successful launch ever?

    Wow, Bill, really grasping at straws here, aren’t you? Comparing human relationships to software released by a company that has caused people to, by and large, consider where the new workflow is headed and whether or not they think it will be worthwhile for their business is not the same thing at all.

    Besides, by your definition “New Coke” was a hit as well.

    You need more time to think these posts through.

  • Why are you in a 60fps sequence when your footage is 24fps?

  • Gary Huff

    August 5, 2011 at 3:40 pm in reply to: FCP-X: Thinking Differently?

    [Robert Brown]They haven’t been fixing a lot of what I needed them to fix for the 7 years I’ve been a user. Why would they start now?

    And how long will they be given to do so? Will this topic still be rolling along with the same arguments and rebuttals 6 months from now because FCPX is still essentially the same software? How about 12 months from now? How long will it take?

  • Gary Huff

    August 4, 2011 at 4:32 pm in reply to: Transcoding 5D H.264 to ProRes 422HQ

    [Andrew Kmiec]I’m transcoding to ProRes 422HQ 1080 23.98

    Is there a particular reason you are encoding it to ProRes HQ? That is overkill for DSLR footage.

  • Gary Huff

    August 4, 2011 at 4:28 pm in reply to: New Beast System, Failing Speeds!

    [Mathew Haycock]Could it be that my system is actually running 32bit?

    Not really. You couldn’t run CS5 at all under Windows if it was the 32bit version. Unlike OSX, there are two separate installs for Windows, one 32bit and one 64bit, and never the twain shall meet.

    You did mention that you couldn’t find the Mercury Engine settings. Are you absolutely sure you are running CS5 and not CS4? Is your splash screen (the logo that pops up when you first launch) light purple or dark purple?

  • My settings are set to match this for my sequence under DVDPROHD 720 (60).

    Please clarify this. Are you in a 60p sequence or a 24p sequence?

  • Gary Huff

    August 4, 2011 at 1:32 pm in reply to: “Generating Peak Files” out of control

    That’s the exact name of the file.

Page 170 of 180

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy