Forum Replies Created

  • Erich Hoberg

    January 27, 2009 at 2:22 pm in reply to: Source Timecode on QT Reference Movies

    I certainly think its possible, but I’m confused because if a self contained FCP carries smtpe tc over automatically, why wouldn’t a self contained compressed version do the same? How would you copy the track over? Where are the setting is in the converson for that?

    Thanks,

    Erich

  • Erich Hoberg

    March 17, 2008 at 7:06 pm in reply to: The Culprit Of Extremely Large Project Files

    Would still frames created in final cut pro have any adverse effect on a project file’s size?

    Erich Hoberg
    iEdit Creative
    Dual Quad 3.2 GHZ
    8GB SDRR
    FCP 6.0.2
    QT 7.3.1

  • Erich Hoberg

    March 12, 2008 at 1:14 pm in reply to: Project File Follow Up

    “Do still frames have the same ….”

    I should clarify that by still frames, I am referring to freeze frames created inside of Final Cut Pro.

    Erich Hoberg
    iEdit Creative
    Dual Quad 3.2
    8 GB DDR2

  • Erich Hoberg

    February 8, 2008 at 12:24 am in reply to: Now I see why they call it ‘Media Mangler’

    I know I’m jumping in this a little late, but I just got involved with a DVcProHD project requiring a 6 angle multiclip that I am thinking of editing offline. My initial reaction is to down convert the hd footage through my aja kona 3, edit the multicam sequences, delete (or move) the dv clips, then recapture the timeline at full resolution. That should work in theory right? What you guys are saying is that it doesn’t though because it loses the multicam cuts? Or is that only an issue going through the media manager?

    Erich Hoberg
    iEdit Creative
    FCP 6.0.2

  • Erich Hoberg

    February 8, 2008 at 12:11 am in reply to: Slow Write/Read Time w/ G-Raid Drives

    Indeed. Hooking one up via the port on the rear and hooking the other one up via the port on the front did dramatically improve the drives’ performance. They still didn’t support the 3 streams of DVCProHD as touted on both on the product’s page and on the box so they will be returned. I plan on getting a raid for future projects, but given my timeframe, I think off-lining this project would be best. Thanks for everyone’s take regarding this.

  • Erich Hoberg

    February 8, 2008 at 12:10 am in reply to: Slow Write/Read Time w/ G-Raid Drives

    Indeed. Hooking one up via the port on the rear and hooking the other one up via the port on the front did dramatically improve the drives’ performance. They still didn’t support the 3 streams of DVCProHD as touted on both on the product’s page and on the box so they will be returned. I plan on getting a raid for future projects, but given my timeframe, I think off-lining this project would be best.

  • Erich Hoberg

    February 7, 2008 at 2:03 am in reply to: Slow Write/Read Time w/ G-Raid Drives

    Walter:

    These are the G-Raid 2 series 2 TB drives and I too fully expected to get between 50 & 60 mb/s out of them. I had heard about the FW 400 conflict, but thought it might only apply to laptops so I will try that. My only concern with that is the 30″ cinema display has a firewire 400 component built in to its power supply structure. Would you be aware of any ways around that? Does that same conflict apply to usb devices?

    Thanks,

    Erich

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy