Forum Replies Created

Page 101 of 127
  • Ed Dooley

    March 3, 2006 at 4:14 pm in reply to: another documentary question

    This is the one we use. It was (maybe still is) the one PBS used. We always use our letterhead so there’s no way someone could say they didn’t know who it was for.
    Ed

    The undersigned enters into this Agreement with ___________________ (“Producer”). I have been informed and understand that Producer is producing a videotape program and that my name, likeness, image, voice, appearance and/or performance is being recorded and made a part of that production (“Product”).
    1. I grant Producer and its designees the right to use my name, likeness, image, voice, appearance, and performance as embodied in the Product whether recorded on or transferred to videotape, film, slides, photographs, audio tapes, or other media, now known or later developed. This grant includes without limitation the right to edit, mix or duplicate and to use or re-use the Product in whole or part as Producer may elect. Producer or its designee shall have complete ownership of the Product in which I appear, including copyright interests, and I acknowledge that I have no interest or ownership in the Product or its copyright.
    2. I also grant Producer and its designees the right to broadcast, exhibit, market, sell and otherwise distribute the Product, either in whole or in parts, and either alone or with other products, for commercial or non-commercial television or theater, closed-circuit exhibition, home video distribution or any other purpose that Producer or its designees in their sole discretion may determine. This grant includes the right to use the Product for promoting or publicizing any of the uses.
    3. I confirm that I have the right to enter into this Agreement, that I am not restricted by any commitments to their parties, and that Producer has no financial commitment or obligations to me as a result of this Agreement. I hereby give all clearances, copyright and otherwise, for use of my name likeness, image, voice, appearance and performance embodied in the Product. I expressly release and indemnify Producer and its officers, employees, agents and designees from any and all claims known and unknown arising out of or in any way connected with the above granted uses and representations. The rights granted Producer herein are perpetual and worldwide.
    4. Any compensation received for granting the above rights is noted and executed in a separate document.

    I have read the foregoing and understand its terms and stipulations and agree to all of them:

    Granter

  • Something else must be going on. I have Squeeze 4.3 on my PC (as well as Procoder, Cleaner, and TMPGEnc) and I just put a QT file exported from FCP
    right into Squeeze. There was an issue with Squeeze 4 importing QT’s that didn’t have the .mov extension, but I thought it was fixed. This from Jerry Hoffman
    here on the COW “All QT movies must have the .mov extension at the end of their names in order for Squeeze to import them. Not a real problem, but will be addressed in an update according to Sorenson.”
    Ed

    [Todd Beabout] “I believe it is actually called a “component”, although on Apple’s own website they refer to it as “10-bit Uncompressed 4:2:2 codec”.

    In MY experience, which is all that I can attest to, this type of file will not work with SORENSON 3 on a PC, which is what I mentioned that I use. (NOT Procoder…) There may be different components installed with different compression software, I don’t really know. My version of Sorenson, or the version of QT on that box, or many other variables could affect compatibility.

    I also like to scale coming out of FCP because I like to see a “high-rez” version of the file at the size that it is ending up before I compress it for comparison. Looking at a 720×486 uncompressed QT file and comparing that to a 320×240 highly compressed file just doesn’t help me find the right compression settings. But hey, to each his own. I also do happen to trust FCP’s scaling (which was greatly improved in the latest version) over Sorenson Squeeze. I’ve heard the scaling compared negatively to high end compositing apps like After Effects, but not to desktop encoding applications. But again, to each his own.

    To Travis I’d say take a file and export it both uncompressed and a few other ways and compare your results. That is the best way to learn, and you will feel solid about your knowledge.”

  • Ed Dooley

    March 3, 2006 at 3:39 pm in reply to: another documentary question

    Mark already gave you a good source for the big picture. As for people being referred to without actually
    being on camera, no release needed. The person saying something about someone else might be liable
    if they say something slanderous.
    Ed

  • What? I export uncompressed QTs from FCP all the time and put them right into Procoder on a PC, nothing special except QT Pro on it. As for scaling, some compressors scale better than others, and FCP isn’t considered very good at scaling. depending on your compressor, I would consider doing it there.
    Ed

    [Todd Beabout] “Sorenson Squeeze is a great program, and on the PC side it has lots of WMV options. I use it every day.

    I usually export my video from FCP using Sorenson 3 codec with the settings maxed out on quality, and I go ahead and re-size the video to 320×240. I personally would rather let FCP do the scaling, and going uncompressed may also lead to problems if you need to further compress it on a computer that may not have your particular uncompressed codec. For example, I could NOT kick out an uncompressed QT and give that to my Squeeze box, because it is a PC and does not have the Apple Uncompressed codec obviously.”

  • A number of compression apps will compress one file to a number of data rates as separate files. On the Mac, Compression Master does WMV MBR encodes, I think Squeeze does too, but there were some issues a while ago about whether the encoded files from Squeeze were really compliant MBR files.

    1-Always export as either uncompressed (if you have the hard drive space), or export as a reference file (still uncompressed) for the highest quality compressed file.
    The export as reference only works if you’re doing the compression on the same computer you export from. If you’re moving the exported file to another computer, export as self-contained. Compressing a file twice is a no-no if you can avoid it.
    2-If you’re compressing on a PC use WME (there might be others I’m not aware of-maybe Squeeze for PC?). On a Mac, CM3 or look into Squeeze. Use AVI UC for WME or QT UC for Mac apps (or reference file if you use the same Mac as the FCP export).
    3-I don’t think so. WME has the MBR option, and Flip4Mac has it planned, but not available yet.
    HTH,
    Ed

    [TJMaclay] “I am editing in FCP for projects that will end up on a streaming server. This will NOT be used as progressive download, but rather a true streaming server. I need the final file to be WMV and encoded at multiple bit rates for different connection speeds.

    My first question would be this. Once I edit my project in FCP, what would be the ideal format to export to initially? I want a format that is better than the highest quality I would stream at (384K), but not so high quality (uncompressed AVI) that it takes an eternity to export.

    My second question. How would you recommend I encode for multiple bit rates? I have now used Windows Media Encoder on the PC and it works fine. It works great, but only accepts AVI, WMV or MPG. This means I would need to choose one of these three formats in FCP to export to.

    My third question. Is there a way to export directly from FCP to WMV and have the option to encode at multiple bit rates? I own Flip4Mac Studio Pro, so I can export many different ways to WMV from FCP, but I do not see multiple bit rates.

    The caveat here, I’m still very new to this stuff. Any help would be greatly appreciated. If this is posted in the wrong forum or a forum that is not as ideal, please accept my apologies, let me know, and I’ll re-post in another more fitting forum.”

  • Ed Dooley

    February 28, 2006 at 10:29 pm in reply to: Oval Logo looking strange

    When you say you scaled it to the size you want it in the video, did you scale it *up* in size?
    Ed

  • Ed Dooley

    February 28, 2006 at 7:27 pm in reply to: playing quicktime movies in windows

    I *said* camera, not deck. 🙂
    Ed

    >>>Movie Maker works with AVI and WM9 formats. You could export as either for him to edit in MM.
    It would be so much easier for him to hook up a camera to his computer and capture directly himself though.
    You’ll have to capture and convert/export.<<< [scott Hayes] “yep. he doesn’t have a deck though. I may suggest to him it would be cheaper to buy a pos minidv
    camcorder to capture.”

  • Ed Dooley

    February 28, 2006 at 6:06 pm in reply to: playing quicktime movies in windows

    Movie Maker works with AVI and WM9 formats. You could export as either for him to edit in MM.
    It would be so much easier for him to hook up a camera to his computer and capture directly himself though.
    You’ll have to capture and convert/export.
    Ed

  • Ed Dooley

    February 25, 2006 at 6:57 pm in reply to: Connecting TV monitor to computer to test PHOTOSHOP text

    No problem. It’s a pet peeve of mine. As long as it helps you learn all the resources of the COW, I’m happy.
    Ed

    [mike kranyak] “sorry Ed to take up time…. kinda new on CC and didn’t know i can do a search….will do it from now on. thanks !!!!”

  • Ed Dooley

    February 25, 2006 at 5:03 pm in reply to: Help! Extracting avi or .mov via Cinematize for SIGGRAPH

    This may not help you exactly, but I use the free MPEG Streamclip. Apple endorses it (the download is listed on their site).
    I’ve never had any problems with extracting QTs from it.
    HTH,
    Ed

    https://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/video/mpegstreamclip.html

Page 101 of 127

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy