Forum Replies Created

Page 16 of 35
  • Dom Silverio

    November 10, 2005 at 3:31 pm in reply to: Touting Standards Conversion

    Standards Converter is very nice indeed.

    [Shane Ross] “Try THAT on an Avid.”

    But Mixed Format timeline is still more useful 🙂

  • Dom Silverio

    November 9, 2005 at 5:51 pm in reply to: BMD to support AVID !!!!

    I have to agree with Lance on this one Bob.

    I know dozens of broadcast shows that used Mojo successfully. And many of them are fond of the Mojo for ingest/viewing and rough assembly workflow. There are feature length docs and film also edited with Mojo.

    I think people are disappointed with it because they expect Adrenaline connectivity which Avid never tried to pitch the product as. It was meant to be a mobile solution for editors and producers (remember the laptop in the ads when it was released??).

    Anyway a common workaround for the lack of connectivity is to plug in a DSR-1800 via firewire and you got everything you need.

    Most editors who as worked on Mojo I know would rather work with Mojo than a XPro software only system. With Mojo you get RT client output esepcially with 24p based project.

    Do we need Mojo SDI/XLR ?? SURE!!

    .02

  • Dom Silverio

    November 8, 2005 at 6:44 pm in reply to: Aaton Cantar workflow advice

    Thanks Michael. I have that article saved in my drive actually!

    Your reassurance is good – so it will be 24 bit/ 48.048 audio while working in 23.976p project type in Avid.

    Thanks a mil!

  • Dom Silverio

    November 8, 2005 at 3:14 pm in reply to: Adrenaline Hell…Help

    Try opening a new project and open the bin from there. Does it work fine?

    Try deleting MC State, Site Settings and Site Attribute files.

  • Dom Silverio

    November 5, 2005 at 4:25 pm in reply to: Isn’t anybody outraged!

    Its called responding to the reality Tom. There are a lot of people still using the old version. That is the reality of fast moving technology. Some will be left behind. As a gesture of good customer service Apple should write a simple patch (as already been demonstrated).

    Trying to compare 1.25 to 4.5 is a bit silly don’t you think? Sorry, Apple does not have a leg to stand on this. There is no reason for them not to write a patch. They have updated $130 OS even when a newer one is out, I don’t see why they can’t do it with $1000 application.

  • Dom Silverio

    November 4, 2005 at 9:00 pm in reply to: Isn’t anybody outraged!

    That is not really his argument. His point is, buying the quad G5 should not mean you have to purchase a new software. I think he wants Apple to add a FCP patch to support PCIe video cards. IMO, it is a valid request.

  • Dom Silverio

    November 4, 2005 at 3:24 pm in reply to: converting Broadcast .wav files for use in FCP 5

    30 fps- maybe it is saying 29.97 NDF instead of 29.97 DF?

    It is typical to record at 29.97 NDF audio TC when working with 24p based images.

  • Dom Silverio

    November 3, 2005 at 5:11 am in reply to: Batch Import

    Are you sure?
    If your import correctly, then your old media will be replaced. So it should be either correct or offline.

  • Dom Silverio

    October 31, 2005 at 8:59 pm in reply to: Workflow between two Avids

    Give him a copy of the bins containing the new master clips.
    For the music – highlight the offline master clips from his bin and use the Batch Import command.
    For new tape based media, same thing – high and use the Batch Capture command.

    Your sequence should automatically connect to it.

    If it does not, highlight the sequence and the new master clips and invoke the Relink command.

    HTH

  • Dom Silverio

    October 24, 2005 at 6:39 pm in reply to: Adrenaline HD 23.976 realtime downconvert?

    Check the Digital Cut tool – there should be an option for NTSC output.

Page 16 of 35

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy