Forum Replies Created

Page 27 of 54
  • Dan Riley

    January 22, 2007 at 10:41 pm in reply to: Split Screen.

    Put one on video track one, and the other on video track two.
    Double click on the first clip in video track one.
    In the viewer go to the motion tab and adjust the size to what you want.
    Double click on the first clip in video track two.
    In the viewer go to the motion tab and adjust the size to what you want.
    If you want a background other than black, move those two tracks you
    presently have to tracks two and three, then put some other source
    on track one.

    Render, (probably but not always).

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 22, 2007 at 9:25 pm in reply to: Multiclip audio slipping problem

    Probably, and this is just a guess, that one camera was running
    in non drop frame mode and the others were running in drop frame,
    or the opposite. This will show up as the minutes roll on.
    Fo 30 seconds or a minute it will be no problem but after a while
    you will not see a match between the cameras.

    If this is the case, let me know and I’ll tell you how to fix this.

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 21, 2007 at 2:06 am in reply to: TRACKS 1&2 TO CHANNELS 3&4

    do you have four little lights on the front of the edit to tape window
    to show all four audio channels enabled?

    If you go to audio/video settings, AV devices, is there a check in the box
    “different output for edit to tape/print to video? If so, uncheck it.

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 20, 2007 at 7:30 pm in reply to: Multicam Troubles in FCP

    You don’t load the multiclip into the viewer, you drag it to the sequence.
    Then you play and switch between the cameras in the viewer.
    Or you load the multiclip into the viewer and then just overwrite (red button)
    what’s in the viewer into the sequence, the do the same as I a mentioned.
    Is this what you are doing? And it still doesn’t work?

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 18, 2007 at 5:50 pm in reply to: COW Reviews: CalDigit: S2VR HD

    Are there issues with green screen chroma keys with DVCPRO HD?
    We are doing more and more of that for our testimonial shoots.
    When I offline at DV the chroma key didn’t look too good, even when I
    used the Nattress 411 filter. Then after the uprez to uncompressed timeline,
    the keys using Boris Continuum looked very good.
    Would I get better chroma keys in an uncompressed HD timeline versus
    DVCPRO HD timeline?

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 18, 2007 at 3:35 pm in reply to: COW Reviews: CalDigit: S2VR HD

    You master out your project at DVCPRO HD?
    So this is an acceptable format for your cable network client?
    That’s good news. I guess I had been reading there were issues
    with DVCPRO HD as a finishing format. Kinda like BetaSP to acquire
    and DigiBeta to finish. Not a good analogy with DVCPRO HD to D5
    for instance?

    dr

  • Dan Riley

    January 18, 2007 at 3:25 am in reply to: Multiple camera angles

    FCP 5 and above has multicam editing available.
    Do you not have FCP 5 or above?

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 18, 2007 at 3:24 am in reply to: COW Reviews: CalDigit: S2VR HD

    So Shane, you offline DVCPRO HD?
    Is this common? Do others do this as well?
    Seems like a decent idea.
    (just gathering workflow and hardware info for our change to HD in a few months).
    I offline in DV now for my SD uncompressed projects.

    Thanks,
    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 18, 2007 at 1:06 am in reply to: COW Reviews: CalDigit: S2VR HD

    so the 444 unit is also in the S2VR series?
    I didn’t understand that from the naming sequence.

    So Walter, you use the 5 drive unit, and like it?
    Doesn’t seem like enough storage for HD.
    Do you find 3.5 TB to be enough?

    Dan

  • Dan Riley

    January 17, 2007 at 11:48 pm in reply to: COW Reviews: CalDigit: S2VR HD

    Great article Bob.
    A question if I may:

    If you go to the CalDigit site, it says 450MB/s in the performance mode ( I assume
    this is RAID O ) and 250MB/s in the protected mode (assuming this might be
    RAID 5 ?). Your review numbers are in the 200s and above for all the systems.
    Were your tests all done in protection mode? Or am I reading their ad wrong?

    Thanks,
    Dan

Page 27 of 54

We use anonymous cookies to give you the best experience we can.
Our Privacy policy | GDPR Policy