Daniel Elder
Forum Replies Created
-
Thanks… I still don’t know how to recreate the short bursts of light? I have everything else pretty well down?
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
-
Thanks, I’ve been looking into those for sure, just wish there was an app for straight to DVD, hmmm.
D
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
Sorry for the delayed reply, but Clip Notes is awesome. I have never heard or used and will definitely take advantage.
Now what about if the client is in the office and you want to streamline that workflow, so it’s not a lot of waiting for the ram preview? What techniques that are built into after effects as well as 3rd party tools are the best to use?
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
I think the biggest issue is the text size, and the speed, so I will be handling that side of it first. I sent out a 1280 x 720 version and had similar results which leads me to believe that the size of my roll to it’s length needs to be addressed. I will give this a shot and see what happens, thanks everyone for your help
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
OK, I will give that a try and see what happens. What is the smallest font size I can be safe with within the HD spectrum, as well we will be downconverting it to a letterboxed SD master?
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
The ProRez version is a QT file, so you shouldn’t have problems playing it, since it’s a .mov.
The Data Rate for the ProRez is about between 175.80 mbits/s and 211 mbits/s and it plays pretty good, there are slight hiccups, like I was saying before about every 10 to 15 frames.
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
I played them in both Quicktime and FCP, and FCP does handle the ProRez 422 version pretty well, there is a slight hiccup every 10th frame or so.
The Lossless version, the data rate is way to high, and can’t be handled by anything, it seems?
The Sorensom 3 still sucks
The Tiff to ProRez 422 is almost the same as the straight to the ProRez 422, but I feel the straight to ProRez 422 was handled a little bit better.
So, I think the ProRez 422 is the closest I’ve come to something that looks acceptable, but it isn’t perfect, so would that be something that it probably is fine, but my computer isn’t handling the data rate? Or do I need to still try to tweak some settings?
Oh how I wish I had one of those 8Core 3.2 ghz systems right now!!
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
If you hold down the Option Key(Mac) you can download it to your download folder, not sure on a PC.
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com -
Thanks for the response, it is set up at 23.976, 1920×1080, square pixels. I just did a render out and I rendered a version with the ProRez 422 codec, the Lossless Codec, the Sorensom 3 Codec, and as a Tiff Sequence.
The ProRez 422 actually played well and was about as acceptable as I’ve gotten it.
The Lossless played well, but stopped playing about 5 seconds in, my guess too much information to process?
The Sorensom 3 sucked, and I’m uploading that and the ProRez Version, and it’ll be up momentarily. That way you can see the difference
The TIFF sequence, I then rendered out as a ProRez 422 and that was almost acceptable, it had a slight stutter every 5th – 10th frame
Oh and here are my exact computer specs: Quad Core 2.5 Ghz G5, 8 GB of Ram, and a NVDIA Quadro FX 4500. I am playing from a Firewire 800 G-Tech Drive?? But when I sent to my desktop, didn’t do much better.
Will post a link shortly so you can download the files to look at.
Daniel Elder
producer
http://www.luminair.com